and life continues...
previous post I was feeling that remicade was failing for me, having pain, watery stools and blood in the am whenever something passed through my distal colon. saw the specialist, he put me on prednisone (surprise surprise) to clear the flare, and then said wait and see how the next remicade infusion went. I had it about two weeks ago now, and I am off the prednisone, which incidentally, didn't seem to help...maybe a little less blood, and the remicade maybe worked a little, but I am symptomatic again. I see the specialist again on the 24th, last time I saw him he said he would have to scope me before he'd be willing to change anything with the remicade...which had been working quite well up until may, I guess I was on it a year and a half. Anyway, that's where I'm at, mildly depressed by the whole thing, and I've started thinking about life without a colon and how good/bad that would be?? Is it fair for him to make me wait for a scope before increasing the remicade? I mean, we are talking three months (at best) before they will get me in for a scope, unless of course I start losing life threatening amounts of blood and end up in the ER. Which is exactly how I ended up on remicade to begin with. And it seems to me that if surgery is the answer, wouldn't it be best to have it while I'm relatively healthy and have a decent body weight?? sorry for the rant. any insights would be appreciated.
brad
previous post I was feeling that remicade was failing for me, having pain, watery stools and blood in the am whenever something passed through my distal colon. saw the specialist, he put me on prednisone (surprise surprise) to clear the flare, and then said wait and see how the next remicade infusion went. I had it about two weeks ago now, and I am off the prednisone, which incidentally, didn't seem to help...maybe a little less blood, and the remicade maybe worked a little, but I am symptomatic again. I see the specialist again on the 24th, last time I saw him he said he would have to scope me before he'd be willing to change anything with the remicade...which had been working quite well up until may, I guess I was on it a year and a half. Anyway, that's where I'm at, mildly depressed by the whole thing, and I've started thinking about life without a colon and how good/bad that would be?? Is it fair for him to make me wait for a scope before increasing the remicade? I mean, we are talking three months (at best) before they will get me in for a scope, unless of course I start losing life threatening amounts of blood and end up in the ER. Which is exactly how I ended up on remicade to begin with. And it seems to me that if surgery is the answer, wouldn't it be best to have it while I'm relatively healthy and have a decent body weight?? sorry for the rant. any insights would be appreciated.
brad