Well, I was wrong. It's something like 98%. Most problematic foreign seafood (tuna, salmon, shrimp) seems to be raised on animal/pig/human manure and a steady diet of banned antibiotics. Mind you this was 2011:
"Only about 1 percent is inspected, and only 0.1 percent is tested for banned drug residues, according to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress."
"More than 51 percent of the seafood that was inspected and turned away from ports was filthy, meaning it was spoiled or contained physical abnormalities, or it was contaminated with a foodborne pathogen. About 20 percent of those cases involved salmonella, according to the News21 analysis of FDA import refusal data."
"Alabama scientists tested 258 samples of catfish and a related species from China, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia and Cambodia from 2002 to 2010. Forty-four percent of samples tested positive for an antibiotic used to treat pneumonia and tuberculosis. The FDA banned the same antibiotic for use in produce and fish in 1997."
http://foodsafety.news21.com/2011/imports/seafood
That's not to say the FDA actually cares about your health. The US is one of the few developed countries that has no upper limit for the application of (another unlabled ingredient, like upcoming GMO salmon) STPP (sodium tripolyphosphate) which the FDA deems GRAS (generally recognized as safe). Its a neurotoxin that makes spoiled fish less runny and appear A-OK. It's said to add a soapy, alkaline taste to white, flaky fish. Yum.
They've got better things to do; like SWAT team raids on raw food co-ops and putting the owners in solitary confinement. Google: James Stewart Rawesome foods or here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/033220_Rawesome_Foods_armed_raids.html
