Hi ..
My son had a colonoscopy last month. I had requested mast cell staining to check for mastocytic enterocolitis. The doctor thought it was a good idea and said they would do it. After the pathologist tests were completed, he told me over the phone that there were mast cells present but they were considered in normal amounts. After receiving copies of the pathologist report, there wasn't any mention of mast cells. I called and asked to get a copy of the mast cell staining results. Today, I received a fax from the doctor that basically said, as I had told you the number of mast cells were considered within normal limits, so the pathologist did not think it was necessary to do the special stain.
Well ... maybe that is true, but isn't the special stain needed to get an accurate count of mast cells?
I am trying to research this as well ... but thought I try here too.
Thanks for any help!
My son had a colonoscopy last month. I had requested mast cell staining to check for mastocytic enterocolitis. The doctor thought it was a good idea and said they would do it. After the pathologist tests were completed, he told me over the phone that there were mast cells present but they were considered in normal amounts. After receiving copies of the pathologist report, there wasn't any mention of mast cells. I called and asked to get a copy of the mast cell staining results. Today, I received a fax from the doctor that basically said, as I had told you the number of mast cells were considered within normal limits, so the pathologist did not think it was necessary to do the special stain.
Well ... maybe that is true, but isn't the special stain needed to get an accurate count of mast cells?
I am trying to research this as well ... but thought I try here too.
Thanks for any help!