I went for my flu jab today and to ask at the surgery if they'd heard anything about a follow up appointment after my recent resection. Anyhow, the nurse said there were a few letters on the system and we had a look at them.
The one outlining my hospital stay started with my colonoscopy and MRI results which led to the surgery, and it's the colonoscopy that's floored me a bit.
The letter said 'evidence of quiescent pancolitis.' I'm a bit gobsmacked really. Is that not inactive UC? My diagnosis is Crohn's of the TI with a bladder/bowel fistula and there has never been any mention of UC - I've had four colonoscopies.
The surgery are chasing my follow up so I can ask when I eventually see the GI. Just wondered if anyone here could shed some light.
The one outlining my hospital stay started with my colonoscopy and MRI results which led to the surgery, and it's the colonoscopy that's floored me a bit.
The letter said 'evidence of quiescent pancolitis.' I'm a bit gobsmacked really. Is that not inactive UC? My diagnosis is Crohn's of the TI with a bladder/bowel fistula and there has never been any mention of UC - I've had four colonoscopies.
The surgery are chasing my follow up so I can ask when I eventually see the GI. Just wondered if anyone here could shed some light.