- Location
- Northern California, USA
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/14/50/abstract
A retrospective study showing Maintenance treatment options for paediatric CD in the first year following diagnosis after induction of remission with EEN: supplemental enteral nutrition is better than nothing!
This study examined remission rates in children who used EEN to achieve remission and then either went on AZA or used EN as a supplement but did not use meds.
The remission rate at 1 year for the AZA group was 65%. The remission rate for the EN group was 60%. The remission rate for those who used nothing was 15%.
This is great info but I would express caution in generalizing the results as the numbers in the study were very small. The EN group was only 15 children and only 9 of those retained remission.
I have also posted the link in research articles.
A retrospective study showing Maintenance treatment options for paediatric CD in the first year following diagnosis after induction of remission with EEN: supplemental enteral nutrition is better than nothing!
This study examined remission rates in children who used EEN to achieve remission and then either went on AZA or used EN as a supplement but did not use meds.
The remission rate at 1 year for the AZA group was 65%. The remission rate for the EN group was 60%. The remission rate for those who used nothing was 15%.
This is great info but I would express caution in generalizing the results as the numbers in the study were very small. The EN group was only 15 children and only 9 of those retained remission.
I have also posted the link in research articles.
Last edited: