Hi there
I have had 2 colonoscopies where everything was normal, and one colonscopy where they found ulcers and inflammtion. Yet each time I would have described myself as in a flare (chronic diarrhea/nausea/weight loss/fever).
Do you know if the symptoms start and then they have to be so bad to show up as an abnormal scope?
Or have you had an abnormal scope and yet you have felt absolutely fine?
It seems to be a bit of the chicken and egg scenario. Which comes first?
I have had 2 colonoscopies where everything was normal, and one colonscopy where they found ulcers and inflammtion. Yet each time I would have described myself as in a flare (chronic diarrhea/nausea/weight loss/fever).
Do you know if the symptoms start and then they have to be so bad to show up as an abnormal scope?
Or have you had an abnormal scope and yet you have felt absolutely fine?
It seems to be a bit of the chicken and egg scenario. Which comes first?