Interesting, i wonder if they could ever come up with a jelly or solid form of EEN for those who can still eat, such that it dissolves quickly in the stomach and not cause issues in the GI tract like regular food that would then quenches hunger and won't stick to teeth. Doesn't seem like any one really tried.Not eating solid food is extremely difficult
Children are given een but they don’t realize they have a choice
Psychologically smelling food watching other eat food is very very hard
Add in your stomach was made to digest solid food
Your jaw needs to physically chew
When on een you get blood sugar spikes
You get bad breath /decaying teeth and probable liquid stool (liquid in equals liquid out )
My kiddo did een twice
Extremely difficult to do even at age 7 then again at age 12
watching others eat
most adults are lucky to make it 2-3 weeks without solid food
That’s why
If you can handle it
Go for it
But it’s not as simple as it sounds
It's seldom used for adults because adults are in control of their own eating, and very few adults can stick to a diet with no solid food - just too restrictive. Same for teenagers. But little kids can have their diet controlled by their parents - making EEN a feasible option.I never understand why it's more common in the pediatric world. EEN works on adults too according to a lot of studies.
I read a paper that said een significantly improved gut biome in terms of removing harmful bacteria, that thrives on sugar, and so I think it's worth doing even for colonic inflammation. Gut biome is heavily under researched for ibd. And I don't imagine many with ibd have a biome balance anything like healthy patients.EN is formulated to simplify digestion, that's what it is designed to do. Its ability to lower inflammation in crohn's disease was unexpected.
Digestion takes place in the small intestine, not the colon. That EN is less effective in treating colonic disease is to be expected. EN likely limits fermentation of colonic bacteria, but the fermentation process itself is not the culprit of inflammation.
I have determination to try 12 weeks on een polymeric formula. I don't have good relationship with food as it is, I find it a chore so I won't miss not eating lol.As @Scipio stated, it's just compliance. Even with a teen, the teenager has to be 100% on board with EEN, otherwise it's just too easy for them to sneak food at school or after school. Most adults don't want to spend 6-8 weeks without eating any food. Little kids, on the other hand, just have no real choice since their parents make decisions for them and they're not used to making their own decisions.
@momsa, while studies do show it's more effective in small bowel disease, we've had a number of kids/teens on the forum do very well on EEN even with isolated colonic disease.
In general, treatment with EN causes a reduction in microbiome diversity and increases dysbiosis, usually shifting away from what would be considered a "healthy" microbiome in controls. Some studies use stool samples to come up with a microbiome picture, others mucosal tissue, and the results vary somewhat. But in general, EN "worsens" dysbiosis and greatly reduces microbiome diversity.I read a paper that said een significantly improved gut biome in terms of removing harmful bacteria, that thrives on sugar, and so I think it's worth doing even for colonic inflammation. Gut biome is heavily under researched for ibd. And I don't imagine many with ibd have a biome balance anything like healthy patients.
One of the most important studies and clues we have are those from professor Rutgeerts. He did very important research in the 80s and 90s.explains why liquid diets help calm and repair?
Is there not already disbiosis from ibd patients due to inflammation anyway? Swapping one for another but one has no inflammation seems like a good idea. For partial nutrition setup perhaps high fermented foods can help undo disbiosis?In general, treatment with EN causes a reduction in microbiome diversity and increases dysbiosis, usually shifting away from what would be considered a "healthy" microbiome in controls. Some studies use stool samples to come up with a microbiome picture, others mucosal tissue, and the results vary somewhat. But in general, EN "worsens" dysbiosis and greatly reduces microbiome diversity.
Whatever method of action underlies EN and its ability to reduce inflammation in crohn's disease, it is unlikely that it is the result of a microbiome shift to a so-called "healthy microbiome", quite the opposite.
One of the most important studies and clues we have are those from professor Rutgeerts. He did very important research in the 80s and 90s.
One of his most interesting studies are his crohn's disease studies about the impact of the fecal stream.
-If you remove or divert the fecal stream in patients, their bowel heals.
-If you introduce a patient's effluent onto previously unaffected tissue, that tissue develops crohn's disease.
-If you filter that same effluent to the point where all bacteria, fungi and microparticles are removed, no inflammation takes place.
A different team under Harper confirmed this in his own patients. This happens in every single patient, and these studies were well done.
You treat people with EN (malnourished, underweight) or you use intravenous feeding for serious cases (anorexic, hypercatabolism), and somehow their bowel heals. This might be explained due to a reduction in the fecal stream.
Right, it shouldn't be seen as a trade-off. The inflammation is the destructive part of crohn's disease. If EN maintains remission, that's all that matters. You give a person with intestinal TB antibiotics, regardless of what it does with microbioal diversity, it's not some kind of trade-off where you weigh inflammation against microbial diversity, no, everything is secondary to treating the infection and preventing destructive inflammation.Swapping one for another but one has no inflammation seems like a good idea.