Animal based diet quickly alters bacteria to lead to IBD

Crohn's Disease Forum

Help Support Crohn's Disease Forum:

Joined
Dec 26, 2013
Messages
65
Eating meat could alter bacteria in the gut that leads to IBD, say researchers. According to a Harvard investigation it doesn't take long to alter the trillions of microbes in the intestines to lead to Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or other forms of IBD that are still poorly understood. The changes happen in just one day. The finding supports the notion that food can be used as a treatment for inflammatory bowel disease and that meat greatly contributes to inflammatory bowel disease. Kathleen Blanchard reports from EmaxHealth.com.

Meat and plants have different effects on intestinal flora

For their study, published in the journal Nature, the researchers studied 11 people. The participants ate their normal diet over a period of four days, documented their food intake and submitted stool (fecal) specimens for testing. Over the next four days they ate what the researchers provided and again had fecal testing. The investigators then watched the participants for the next six days as a control.

Eating a plant based diet that was low fat and low protein had little effect on the gut bacteria. Conversely, eating an animal based diet that was low in fiber significantly changed microbes in the gut that can cause inflammation.

Lawrence David, one of the Harvard researchers and now an assistant professor at Duke University’s Molecular Genetics & Microbiology and Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy said in a press release: “We’re getting an increasing appreciation of how flexible and responsive the microbiome is, even on a very short time scale.”

Previous studies showed the same results in mice, but this is the first time it has been replicated in humans, David said.

It's all about the host

Thousands of bacteria live in the intestines and on our skin and how they interact with humans who are the host has been poorly understood. Why some bacteria become invasive is a complex issue that seems to depend on balance.

One of the bacterium that increased from eating meat and found in this study was Bilophila wadsworthia, which is known to cause colitis in mice.

The authors also found" eating meat increased other microorganisms that are "bile tolerant", including Alistipes, Bilophila and Bacteroides, in addition to decreasing levels of Firmicutes that metabolize dietary plant polysaccharides - Roseburia, Eubacterium rectale and Ruminococcus bromii.

Eating a high fat diet has previously been linked to changes in intestinal bacteria that can lead to obesity, type 2 diabetes and a variety of other chronic illnesses. People with lower levels of Firmicutes are generally obese and have higher fat intake, but questions have remained whether obesity or diet are responsible for changes in the gut flora.

A study conducted on Zebrafish also showed more fat is extracted from the diet when Firmicutes bacteria is more rampant, supporting the notion that what lives in our intestines has an influence on obesity and other types of inflammatory conditions.

“Perhaps in prehistoric groups, when there was a lot more volatility in terms of what you can forage or hunt for, this could have been very useful,” David said. “It creates a way of buffering nutritional changes and may have enabled ancient humans to be a little more flexible with their diet. Eating meat also altered the way some of the bacteria expressed genes.

Understanding how an animal based diet can lead to changes in intestinal bacteria that cause IBD means switching to primarily plant based foods and lowering met intake that is generally high in fat could be a valuable intervention for treating Crohn's disease and colitis.
 
i recall reading some of this article, but not enough to catch the statement about the ability of animal based diets to encourage changes in bacteria associated with development of IBD.

thanks for revisiting this article.
 
Was antibiotic use in conventional meat products accounted for? This could explain gut alteration. I don't know if the results would be replicated on
a diet that included meat from
Organic pasture raised animals only.
 
Was antibiotic use in conventional meat products accounted for? This could explain gut alteration. I don't know if the results would be replicated on
a diet that included meat from
Organic pasture raised animals only.

Antibiotics don't appear to be a factor in the specific bacteria linked to IBD and animal consumption (Bilophila wadsworthia), even with DIRECT antibiotic use:

http://jcm.asm.org/content/50/10/3258.full

"To avoid potential confounding factors associated with previous studies in adults, including previous treatment with antibiotics or anti-inflammatory therapies, differences in stage of disease, smoking, and alcohol intake, we conducted the current study in children newly diagnosed with CD who had not undergone prior antibiotic or anti-inflammatory therapy for CD and age-matched controls."

That said, there are other studies which also show harmful shifts in gut bacteria through animal consumption and positive shifts through high-fiber (plant-based) foods. The significance of this study is the link to IBD.

Also worth noting: "B. wadsworthia has been associated with human infections, including appendicitis and cholecystitis".
 
Thanks for sharing, but I gotta say 11 people is not enough to base a definitive conclusion, similarly, so many people have showed benefit off paleo and SCD diet which is largely made up of protein from animal meat... certainly very interesting though.
 
The actual study...
"short-term consumption of diets composed entirely of animal or plant products"
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature12820.html

Once again we have spent thousands of dollars to demonstrate that someone will have different bacteria if their diet is ENTIRELY meat or ENTIRELY plant,
and then make completely invalid conclusions from the study.

If i change my diet, my bacteria WILL change, big deal?.
Only if it changes enough to move outside the 'healthy range' for me.

There is a HUGE tolerance for bacterial diversity, and what is 'normal' in one person both varies enormously from day to day and week to week, and may also not be normal for someone else.

According to a Harvard investigation it doesn't .......
There's your first problem :smile:......
"As a case study, I used a collaboration of researchers from the Harvard School of Public Health, led by Walter Willett, who runs the Nurses’ Health Study. And I pointed out that every time that these Harvard researchers had claimed that an association observed in their observational trials was a causal relationship—that food or drug X caused disease or health benefit Y—and that this supposed causal relationship had then been tested in experiment, the experiment had failed to confirm the causal interpretation—i.e., the folks from Harvard got it wrong. Not most times, but every time."
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/c...nutrition-studies-are-all-wrong/#.Uu3VrvvbxKo

Eating a plant based diet that was low fat and low protein had little effect on the gut bacteria. Conversely, eating an animal based diet that was low in fiber significantly changed microbes in the gut that can cause inflammation.
There's your second problem "animal based diet that was low in fiber"
Simple to check, try a diet with meat AND fibre
By the way, a diet that is only meat isn't 'animal based' it's "animal only"

"Can cause inflammation" - let me know when they write "DID cause inflammation"

One of the bacterium that increased from eating meat and found in this study was Bilophila wadsworthia, which is known to cause colitis in mice.

The authors also found " eating meat increased other microorganisms that are "bile tolerant", including Alistipes, Bilophila and Bacteroides, in addition to decreasing levels of Firmicutes that metabolize dietary plant polysaccharides - Roseburia, Eubacterium rectale and Ruminococcus bromii.

Gee, more bacteria that digest meat on a meat only diet,
Ohh great and wise scientist, please explain this mystery for me

Eating a high fat diet has previously been linked to changes in intestinal bacteria that can lead to obesity, type 2 diabetes and a variety of other chronic illnesses.
Funny, that's not what i read,
" We could not correlate changes in gut microbiota with fat or carbohydrate intake. "
The study linked here showed a link between obesity (not a high fat diet) and changes in intestinal bacteria that can lead to obesity, type 2 diabetes and a variety of other chronic illnesses.

People with lower levels of Firmicutes are generally obese and have higher fat intake, but questions have remained whether obesity or diet are responsible for changes in the gut flora.
Funny, that's not what i read,
"Distribution of Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes was significantly increased in the obese group compared to the normal weight group "
"As regards the results of dietary analysis, subjects were divided into low and high fat intake. According to carbohydrate intake they were divided into four groups. The fourth group had the highest carbohydrate intake. We could not correlate changes in gut microbiota with fat or carbohydrate intake. Interestingly, the study found a trend for subjects with high fat intake to have positive Firmicutes, and those with the highest carbohydrate intake to have positive Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes"


Time for a quick question,
What's the difference between science and Bullshit?
Answer - very little,

Understanding how an animal based diet can lead to changes in intestinal bacteria that cause IBD means switching to primarily plant based foods and lowering meat intake that is generally high in fat could be a valuable intervention for treating Crohn's disease and colitis.
Or it could be a profitable diversion away from research into processed foods (especially pasty carbohydrates and sugar crap)
 
Back
Top