Pure speculation on my part, so take it for what its worth. Even done laproscopically, my assumption is that all that would reveal is the external side of the ileum, unless they actually cut into the ileum itself. Think an external exam would be very, very beneficial... but an internal exam of the ileum via a pillcam MUST be superior to that, otherwise it would have no reason for being developed, and doctors no need to get it performed. and, sure, there are lots of less than brilliant docs out there, I have no idea what your current doc is like. If you aren't comfortable with your current doc, its a matter of finding one that you are confident in. Asking questions, regardless of whether you have a good doc or a bad one, is always a great idea. Bear in mind, that good or not, doctors tend to think/talk in a way that's extremely puzzling. for example, a test with negative results is good, whereas one with positive results is bad. The inside of the ileum is considered external to the body, yet the outside of the ileum is inside the body.
No wonder us 'uneducated' folks get all confused. Again, pure speculation, but if 'they' wanted to see if any of the ulceration in the ileum had progressed so much it had perforated, or was close to doing so, then laproscopic exam should show that.
But, how many more ulcerations or inflammatory spots there are inside the ileum, I think only a pill cam would show that. Now, that's just my 'uneducated' guess, but I wouldn't take my word for it. I'd ask the doc who wants it done what benefits it provides. Think asking things like this till you get a satisfactory answer from the 'horses' aaaaa... mouth, is probably a good habit to get into. Least, I think it is..