I'm confused about what actually heals a fistula.
So many people and doctors say biologics are best. But then other people say that it really just comes down to keeping the inflammation down so they can heal on their own. The inflammation theory makes the most sense to me. Its not like biologics mechanically heal things. Is it just that most people with fistulizing crohns have severe crohns that only responds to biologics anyway? So the fistulas indirectly heal? Or is there something about the biologics that I'm missing that genuinely does something specific on a fistula? I just don't see what that would be.
I've got a lot of new promising treatments I'm trying. I hope they keep the crohns away and the inflammation down. But am I kidding myself that that alone will let the fistulas heal? Or is it really just biologics or surgery?
(For the record, I'm not against biologics. I just have developed a history of various issues with them.)
So many people and doctors say biologics are best. But then other people say that it really just comes down to keeping the inflammation down so they can heal on their own. The inflammation theory makes the most sense to me. Its not like biologics mechanically heal things. Is it just that most people with fistulizing crohns have severe crohns that only responds to biologics anyway? So the fistulas indirectly heal? Or is there something about the biologics that I'm missing that genuinely does something specific on a fistula? I just don't see what that would be.
I've got a lot of new promising treatments I'm trying. I hope they keep the crohns away and the inflammation down. But am I kidding myself that that alone will let the fistulas heal? Or is it really just biologics or surgery?
(For the record, I'm not against biologics. I just have developed a history of various issues with them.)