Alteration of Intestinal Dysbiosis by Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Does not Induce remission in Patients with Chronic Active Ulcerative

Crohn's Disease Forum

Help Support Crohn's Disease Forum:

Thx for posting, other studies have been done with multiple transfers and they'd had better results. More research needs to be done though. I think there definitely could be something in this, there have been cases of "cures". Dr Borody in Australia did one, the results are somewhere on the forum, wildbill posted it I think
 
Thank you.

There are specific autoantigens in UC, I don't know why people keep thinking that introducing another gut flora is going to fix this. The immune response isn't directed at the indigenous flora.

It's pretty normal that there is dysbiosis in UC and crohn's disease, there is dysbiosis in every inflammatory disease, including intestinal TB. That doesn't mean dysbiosis is the cause of the disease, all you need is inflammation to create dysbiosis. It would be strange if people with UC and CD did not have dysbiosis.

Even stress is enough to create dysbiosis, has been shown in ruminants. So we should give fecal transplants to everyone who is stressed? I don't get the reasonings behind this "let's give them millions of bacteria without knowing what it does" approach at all.

I hope when someone tries this for crohn's disease, they know that this could potentially worsen the disease too.
 
Last edited:
you are not reading or reporting this abstract correctly.

here is the conclusion of the study:

FMT by a single colonoscopic donor stool application is not effective in inducing remission in chronic active therapy-refractory UC



the aim of this study was to see the effect of only one colonoscopic administration of stool on active ulcerative colitis. Most other studys used not only one colonoscopic stool application, but 5-7 additional enema applications after the colonoscopic application. knowing this, it is easyier to see why this may not have produced similar results.

this study wasnt trying to reproduce prior results of other studys, but tried to answer a specific question of the effects of only one colonoscopic stool application. it absolutely does not negate the results of other fecal transplant protocols nor negate the results of the other protocols that have been shown to be highly effective. but this study needed to be done, im glad they did it.
 
" In 3 patients, the colonic microbiota changed toward the donor microbiota; however, this did not correlate with clinical response"
 
"In 3 patients, the colonic microbiota changed toward the donor microbiota; however, this did not correlate with clinical response"

i'm wondering how long afterwards they followed up, sometimes it can take a while for things to change.
 
all this really suggests is that doing more transplants then one is necessary for a permanant change in microbiota, that is all. the potential for fecal transplants still exists.

The important terms to define here are transient, meaning temporary. And microbial richness, im hoping they were able to monitor the correct species.
What this could mean, is that one colonoscopic fecal transplant may not be enough for permanant correction of dysbiosis, which borody has already shown with multiple fecal transplants in active IBD, where it took a while for the patient to fully match the donor, and these result were consistent with multiple transplants. The changes in dysbiosis correction also remained well after transplants AND correlated with remission.




Successful improvement of dysbiosis by fecal microbiota transplantation is not sufficient to induce clinical remission in chronic active ulcerative colitis

P.K. Kump1, H.-P. Gröchenig2, S. Lackner3, S. Trajanovski3, G. Reicht4, K.M. Hoffmann5, H.H. Wenzl1, W. Petritsch1, G. Gorkiewicz6, C. Hoegenauer1, 1Medical University Graz, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graz, Austria, 2BHB Graz, Internal Medicine, St. Veith, Austria, 3Medical University Graz, Center of Medical Research, Graz, Austria, 4BHB Graz, Internal Medicine, Graz, Austria, 5University Hospital for Pediatric Diseases, Graz, Austria, 6University Graz, Institute of Pathology, Graz, Austria

Background

There is growing evidence, that dysbiosis has a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis (UC). Beside reduced bacterial richness of the intestinal microbiota, an increase of proteobacteria with proinflammatory effects has been described. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), also known as fecal bacteriotherapy, is a new therapeutic approach to restore an altered intestinal microbiota. The aims of this study were to assess the efficacy as well as changes in the intestinal microbiome after FMT in chronic active UC.

Methods

Six patients with chronic, active, therapy-refractory UC, who were considered for total colectomy, were treated with FMT. Donor stool was applied as a single application during colonoscopy to the terminal ileum. Endoscopic and clinical follow up was performed at 4 different time points (day 1, 7, 30 and 90) within 3 month. Microbiota analyses of stool and mucosa samples were performed by 16S rDNA-based microbial community profiling using high-throughput pyrosequencing.

Results

Within the first 14 days all patients experienced a reduction of stool frequency, while microbiota analysis revealed a simultaneous transient increase of microbial richness. However, none of the 6 patients achieved a complete remission and only 2 of the 6 patients had a durable improvement in their clinical UC scores. Subsequently two patients underwent total colectomy and one additional patient was treated with cyclosporine A. Overall no serious side effects occurred and only one patient had a self-limiting episode of fever after FMT.

Microbiome profiling showed different patterns of microbiota remodelling either in terms of approaching to the donors' microbiota, creating a de novo microbial pattern, or by returning to the patient's baseline microbiome. Within the first week after FMT, bacterial richness increased on mucosal samples but decreased again thereafter. On phylum level, FMT significantly reduced over-represented proteobacteria, mainly of the enterobacteriaceae family and resulted in an increase of bacteroidetes.

Conclusion

Although FMT performed by a single colonoscopic application successfully reversed some features of dysbiosis in chronic active UC, it is not effective in inducing sustained remission in these patients. These findings suggest that dysbiosis is at least in part consequence and not cause of this disease.(i fully disagree with this statement, the findings hardly suggest this conclusion, the findings,meaning all other studies that exist in the literature including this one, suggest more transplants are need for permanant changes in correcting dysbiosis, for IBD one transplant is not enough, dysbiosis could still be the cause.)
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top