- Joined
- Jan 8, 2008
- Messages
- 2,253
My newer GI doc whom I acquired in the last hospital stay stated some basic groundwork for inflammatory responses in the foods I eat. He stated as a general rule that grains that grow under the ground such as rice and potatoes are anti-inflammatory (meaning they're safe) and grains such as wheat, corn, and oats are pro-inflammatory as they grow above ground. He says then further that the healthy fats (mono and poly, unsaturated) are also anti-inflammatory and that saturated fats are pro-inflammatory (ie: olive oil and canola oil and fish oils are good, and the others like corn oil and whatnot are bad).
He also happen to mention that just because I see some residual food particles in the toilet doesn't mean that's a particular food that is unsafe, per se. For example the leaves of lettuce or the seeds from tomatoes that may be floating in the toilet don't equate to that being a bad choice of food. Although this piece of advice is still subject to the fact that if you eat something and you have a bad reaction from it, don't eat it again-simple as that. But the doc said everybody, IBD patient or not, sees certain foods in the toilet anyways, so don't be writing off anything that doesn't turn completely to stool after going through me.
Anyone first off have any insight to if this holds true for the grain and fat rule of thumb I mention, and second off, anyone seem to see a trend with what you see expel out of you and not be completely digested?
I notice corn products don't agree with me for starters, but other than that, this disease is so "custom built" to each patient that's about the only established fact I can rely on. I already knew though about the healthy fats, besides I try to focus on those anyways...
He also happen to mention that just because I see some residual food particles in the toilet doesn't mean that's a particular food that is unsafe, per se. For example the leaves of lettuce or the seeds from tomatoes that may be floating in the toilet don't equate to that being a bad choice of food. Although this piece of advice is still subject to the fact that if you eat something and you have a bad reaction from it, don't eat it again-simple as that. But the doc said everybody, IBD patient or not, sees certain foods in the toilet anyways, so don't be writing off anything that doesn't turn completely to stool after going through me.
Anyone first off have any insight to if this holds true for the grain and fat rule of thumb I mention, and second off, anyone seem to see a trend with what you see expel out of you and not be completely digested?
I notice corn products don't agree with me for starters, but other than that, this disease is so "custom built" to each patient that's about the only established fact I can rely on. I already knew though about the healthy fats, besides I try to focus on those anyways...
Last edited: