Have to make the decision AGAIN soon... my Crohn's is practically asymptomatic (a day of pain every couple of months - usually pin-pointed to food I didn't think hard enough about not eating) except for re-occurring anemia... roughly twice a year my iron levels drop low enough to require infusions. My hematologist - who is the one monitoring the levels - shrugs it off - "of course your get anemic, you have Crohn's - we will just infuse you and you will be fine for the next six months". My initial reaction to this was - shouldn't we STOP whatever causes me to get anemic - he has no concern about that since he can treat the anemia. But I also look at the mildness of my symptoms and think - this IS an easy fix and the insurance covers almost all of it (USA - unless insurance reform messes with that in the future)
My GI, however, wants me to have an Argon plasma coagulation (APC) procedure if the anemia returns, which is has again. APC is a fairly low risk procedure using argon gas and electrical current to cauterize internally. Again, another somewhat simple procedure but they do put you under completely and its a bit painful for about 24 hours afterwards. I have had the procedure done twice in the past 2.5 years - it is expected to need repeating up to 4 to 5 times until fully effective. Cost is not an issue - I am blessed with great insurance. Part of me says - RUN - get it done NOW before insurance changes. But part of me says - do I REALLY need this procedure if I can reverse the anemia with infusions?
I get my blood tested again tomorrow to see if it has dropped low enough for the next round of infusions (it is just hovering above the level the insurance allows the infusions.) I just CAN'T make up my mind which doctor to listen to.... any thoughts?
My GI, however, wants me to have an Argon plasma coagulation (APC) procedure if the anemia returns, which is has again. APC is a fairly low risk procedure using argon gas and electrical current to cauterize internally. Again, another somewhat simple procedure but they do put you under completely and its a bit painful for about 24 hours afterwards. I have had the procedure done twice in the past 2.5 years - it is expected to need repeating up to 4 to 5 times until fully effective. Cost is not an issue - I am blessed with great insurance. Part of me says - RUN - get it done NOW before insurance changes. But part of me says - do I REALLY need this procedure if I can reverse the anemia with infusions?
I get my blood tested again tomorrow to see if it has dropped low enough for the next round of infusions (it is just hovering above the level the insurance allows the infusions.) I just CAN'T make up my mind which doctor to listen to.... any thoughts?