kiny
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2011
- Messages
- 3,464
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/121888475/Detection-of-mycobacterium-avium-subsp-paratuberculosis-in-crohn-s-disease-patients-and-ruminants-intestine-by-in-situ-hybridization
Group A with 8 samples showing a granulomatous reaction and ZN (+); and group B with 4 samples showing granulomatous reaction but ZN (-).
Group C included those Crohn’s disease cases in which at histopathological examination we observed transmural inflammatory infiltrate with the presence of macrophages, epitheliod cells and sometimes giant Langhans cells; and considered as granulomatous. Whereas group D consisted of those cases in which infiltration was predominantly lymphocytic with plasma cells or mixed with some granulocytes at mucosal or transmural level which were considered as non granulomatous. In a single case with multiple samples, one was classified within group C and another one in group D. Group C consisted of 7 patients and 10 samples, whereas group D comprised 8 patients with 13 samples.
Results:
In the ruminant groups A and B, as expected, all the samples were positive by in situ hybridization. In humans (groups C and D), overall positivity for
M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis by in situ hybridization was 64.28% (n= 9). According to the groups distribution, all 7 patients (100%) in group C were positive for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis by in situ hybridization, compared to 3/8 (37.5%) patients in group D; this difference was statistically significant (p= 0.0239)
Group A with 8 samples showing a granulomatous reaction and ZN (+); and group B with 4 samples showing granulomatous reaction but ZN (-).
Group C included those Crohn’s disease cases in which at histopathological examination we observed transmural inflammatory infiltrate with the presence of macrophages, epitheliod cells and sometimes giant Langhans cells; and considered as granulomatous. Whereas group D consisted of those cases in which infiltration was predominantly lymphocytic with plasma cells or mixed with some granulocytes at mucosal or transmural level which were considered as non granulomatous. In a single case with multiple samples, one was classified within group C and another one in group D. Group C consisted of 7 patients and 10 samples, whereas group D comprised 8 patients with 13 samples.
Results:
In the ruminant groups A and B, as expected, all the samples were positive by in situ hybridization. In humans (groups C and D), overall positivity for
M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis by in situ hybridization was 64.28% (n= 9). According to the groups distribution, all 7 patients (100%) in group C were positive for M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis by in situ hybridization, compared to 3/8 (37.5%) patients in group D; this difference was statistically significant (p= 0.0239)