- Joined
- Oct 18, 2012
- Messages
- 4,492
I was going to make this a thread on weight gain (yes, I know, another one, but I'm still desperately trying to figure out how to get my weight up) but I think it could apply to weight loss too, or even a diet aimed at managing your symptoms rather than gaining or losing.
It seems there are two main ways of going about a diet - follow a set plan; at the extreme, this could be devised by a dietician, make use of supplements rather than real food, follow a set timetable of meals, with everything calculated to get the required number or calories and/or required nutrients from what's consumed. This controlled approach could also be applied to weight targets - aiming to gain or lose a set amount each week or whatever. Especially if you're in hospital, it might also incorporate NG feeds, TPN, vitamin pills, etc. (When I was having TPN, they individualised the nutritional content to the patient's needs, not just giving me a set amount of calories, but taking daily blood tests to check my nutrient levels, with the following day's feed being adjusted accordingly.)
Then there's the other way, where eating is more intuitive. You may have some guidelines, especially if there are foods you want to avoid for health reasons, but you choose what to eat, when you feel like it, with the idea in the back of your mind that you are trying to eat more, eat less, or consume more healthy foods and less unhealthy ones. And maybe you have some ideas about goals, but you just reassess as you go along how your weight is changing or how your eating has affected your symptoms.
Has anyone tried one or both or these, or (more likely) something in between? Have you found one more successful than the other? Have your doctors or dieticians wanted you to try a structured approach to diet? Can you rely on your intuition to guide you towards the best diet for you? Have you tried a strictly planned diet but found you just can't eat like you intended?
It seems there are two main ways of going about a diet - follow a set plan; at the extreme, this could be devised by a dietician, make use of supplements rather than real food, follow a set timetable of meals, with everything calculated to get the required number or calories and/or required nutrients from what's consumed. This controlled approach could also be applied to weight targets - aiming to gain or lose a set amount each week or whatever. Especially if you're in hospital, it might also incorporate NG feeds, TPN, vitamin pills, etc. (When I was having TPN, they individualised the nutritional content to the patient's needs, not just giving me a set amount of calories, but taking daily blood tests to check my nutrient levels, with the following day's feed being adjusted accordingly.)
Then there's the other way, where eating is more intuitive. You may have some guidelines, especially if there are foods you want to avoid for health reasons, but you choose what to eat, when you feel like it, with the idea in the back of your mind that you are trying to eat more, eat less, or consume more healthy foods and less unhealthy ones. And maybe you have some ideas about goals, but you just reassess as you go along how your weight is changing or how your eating has affected your symptoms.
Has anyone tried one or both or these, or (more likely) something in between? Have you found one more successful than the other? Have your doctors or dieticians wanted you to try a structured approach to diet? Can you rely on your intuition to guide you towards the best diet for you? Have you tried a strictly planned diet but found you just can't eat like you intended?