Bit of a wierd one, wondered if anyone else has had this.
I've had 2 FC's in the past year - both fine (by fine, I mean, that I got a result).
However, I've just had 2 failures with the lab saying there was too much mucous in the sample (although it looked okay to me, but I'm no expert )
Now looking at calprotectin.co.uk it sayeth.
Why is it necessary to avoid mucous in the stool? The sample must be collected without any chemical or biological additions in the collection device. Alpha Labs has been informed by Arne Roseth that the mucous contains glycoproteins that can bind with Calprotectin and not release it. Usually there are sections of the sample that are free from mucous and more solid. If a sample is mostly mucous it is likely not first morning stool. Mucous can affect the reproducibility of the data.
But it was first morning and I hadn't had a colonoscopy or anything funny - in fact, I've given up alot of meds since just about to have surgery for fibrotic stricturing.
Has anyone else had this happen or am I special ?:banana:
I've had 2 FC's in the past year - both fine (by fine, I mean, that I got a result).
However, I've just had 2 failures with the lab saying there was too much mucous in the sample (although it looked okay to me, but I'm no expert )
Now looking at calprotectin.co.uk it sayeth.
Why is it necessary to avoid mucous in the stool? The sample must be collected without any chemical or biological additions in the collection device. Alpha Labs has been informed by Arne Roseth that the mucous contains glycoproteins that can bind with Calprotectin and not release it. Usually there are sections of the sample that are free from mucous and more solid. If a sample is mostly mucous it is likely not first morning stool. Mucous can affect the reproducibility of the data.
But it was first morning and I hadn't had a colonoscopy or anything funny - in fact, I've given up alot of meds since just about to have surgery for fibrotic stricturing.
Has anyone else had this happen or am I special ?:banana: