Entchen
Chief Dandelion Picker
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2010
- Messages
- 1,407
Hi, all
My first GI appointment is coming up this week (Thursday). The GI's assistant tells me that we will probably just be having a conversation (versus any procedures, etc.). Hurray! However, I am wondering what that discussion is going to centre around and would appreciate your input, please. (And, do you think the secretary is right about the no-examination part?) What do you normally talk about with your GI, and are the conversations usually centered around observable signs and test results, your reported symptoms, or a mix of the two? And, do appointments usually lead to further tests?
After diagnosis, I was placed on Salofalk (5-ASA), which many of you have noted is about as mild as they come. This isn't a complaint (I've done the Cipro + Flagyl thing and it wasn't pretty), but it is a little surprising considering the biopsy report states that my current disease level is moderate-to-severe. In 2 months + 1 day on the drug, my pain has decreased, but there only small, if any, changes in the other symptoms (and some of the pain returns if I eat veggies and whole grains like I did pre-diagnosis, too). Do you think that I should be preparing myself for additional tests or medication, or is two months maybe too soon to tell if the drug is going to help move me toward remission?
Sorry, one more thing: GP tells me that my iron levels are continuing to drop despite supplement use. She has asked me to discuss this with the GI. If supplements are not working, will I necessarily be placed on iron shots, or will the GI first try increasing the dose yet again? I've been on 4x what the bottle recommends for 5 months now, yet the anemia is worse. (I can confirm at least some blood loss.)
Thanks so much! Your help really got me out of some anxious moments before the colonoscopy in May, and I appreciate having a place to ask these new questions, too.
My first GI appointment is coming up this week (Thursday). The GI's assistant tells me that we will probably just be having a conversation (versus any procedures, etc.). Hurray! However, I am wondering what that discussion is going to centre around and would appreciate your input, please. (And, do you think the secretary is right about the no-examination part?) What do you normally talk about with your GI, and are the conversations usually centered around observable signs and test results, your reported symptoms, or a mix of the two? And, do appointments usually lead to further tests?
After diagnosis, I was placed on Salofalk (5-ASA), which many of you have noted is about as mild as they come. This isn't a complaint (I've done the Cipro + Flagyl thing and it wasn't pretty), but it is a little surprising considering the biopsy report states that my current disease level is moderate-to-severe. In 2 months + 1 day on the drug, my pain has decreased, but there only small, if any, changes in the other symptoms (and some of the pain returns if I eat veggies and whole grains like I did pre-diagnosis, too). Do you think that I should be preparing myself for additional tests or medication, or is two months maybe too soon to tell if the drug is going to help move me toward remission?
Sorry, one more thing: GP tells me that my iron levels are continuing to drop despite supplement use. She has asked me to discuss this with the GI. If supplements are not working, will I necessarily be placed on iron shots, or will the GI first try increasing the dose yet again? I've been on 4x what the bottle recommends for 5 months now, yet the anemia is worse. (I can confirm at least some blood loss.)
Thanks so much! Your help really got me out of some anxious moments before the colonoscopy in May, and I appreciate having a place to ask these new questions, too.
Last edited: