Just jumping in re supplementing with EN. I believe it made a huge difference for my son as well. Prior to dx, my son lost 20-25 lbs, 145 down to 120ish lbs. (he was 5'10" at the time). Through the 6 weeks of EEN, he gained 10 lbs. His dose was 3000 cal/night (he used NG tube). After the six weeks, he was allowed to add back a regular diet but his ongoing treatment was EN at approx. half dose (1500 cal/night, 5 nights/week). His GI/nutritionist did not specify a food/EN percentage, just maintain the 1500 cal from formula and he could eat as much as he wanted during the day. I found he still ended up with three full meals - would skip breakfast as he was 'full' when waking, had lunch and dinner but then added a meal sized 'snack' later at night (ie pizza, chicken/rice, he even cooked steaks a couple of times!).
Over the next three months, he gained another 20-30 lbs. And this was healthy, muscular, developmental weight. By the time he left for university, so just over two years after dx, he was at 180 lbs! As he was already 5'10" at dx, he only gained approx. 1.5 inches in height.
I'm sorry that the NG tube will be a tough sell for you.
I think using the tube was definitely what allowed his continuation of the formula. He absolutely would not have taken in 1500 cal each day, for such a long time, if he'd had to drink the formula. As well, by having it overnight, it didn't interfere with meals (ie his lunch/dinner wasn't 'smaller' because he wasn't hungry after drinking formula). As well, having those two nights 'off' each week allowed him to sleep at friends' places or go away on weekends without the burden of drinking/ingesting the formula.
Once he left for university, he did not want to use the NG tube, etc plus his GI had added remicade so it was a tough sell for me. I'd wanted him to continue as much as possible for a couple of reasons - one was that he was a picky eater so, without me around, I had strong doubts he'd eat very nutritiously and, second, was that I'd read a study that showed partial EN in combination with remicade had shown significantly improved success/endurance rates with remicade.
Our compromise was that he would drink two Boost shakes each day (not as much formula as in the study but I knew I wouldn't 'win' at trying to get him to drink more). He continued that throughout university. The shakes actually became a convenience for him rather than a medical issue. Instead of making or buying breakfast, he'd have a shake, when running late to a class or hockey game, he'd grab a shake... His roommates actually started drinking shakes because of the convenience! :lol: (I'm not sure how much
that cost me! :ywow
Ironically, since he's been back home and I can now manage things again, he drinks fewer shakes. He still uses them for the 'convenience' at times but it's not as consistent as when he used to just come home for weekends or the summer. I guess we've both become a bit complacent (never a good thing!
)
But, I guess the point of this whole story is that I strongly believe the nutrition he gained from the formula and then shakes helped rebuild his health and then helped maintain it. I know you don't need convincing but if there's any way you can convince your daughter to use the NG or G tube, she would only benefit from it. If she happens to be a picky eater or isn't a big eater at meal times, then a 'bonus' for her (and you) is that there will be less pressure for her to eat 'healthy' (I know this was a relief for my son and me as what he ate and the amounts had been a battle his whole life!).
And, our experience was the same as Maya's - it didn't take long for him to learn to insert/remove tube... and we used infant sized tube (I think his was 6Fr).
:ghug: