Greetings, i am 42 years old with no symptoms or complain of anything 4 months ago i did a routine check ups and they did a colonoscopy and endoscopy ( 2 weeks before that i had a food poising with diharriya and vomiting with mild fever which lasted for a day and a half only. everything was ok but the colonoscopy found few superficial ulcers in terminal ileum so they took biopsies. then the biopsy report came back with prominent lymphoid hyperplasia and focal non sceating granuloma sarcoid alike and suggestion an early stage of crohn's ileitis. so my doctor later asked for MRI and multiple tests few weeks later like CRP,Fecal calproctine,ASCA ,, etc and all showed negative including the MRI. so my doctor said you dont have crohns and the superficial ulcers are from that food poising you had . i am healthy ok and i never in my life had an abdominal pain or blood in stool or noticeable episode of diharriya so no symptoms at all .
my question please is do you go with the doctor oppinion that it is not crohn and i have nothing to worry about . if yes how do we explain the pathology report ? could it be a mistake ?
thank you
my question please is do you go with the doctor oppinion that it is not crohn and i have nothing to worry about . if yes how do we explain the pathology report ? could it be a mistake ?
thank you