- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 698
So I used to think that having both IBD and IBS was BS because IBS was simply a way of doctors saying " We don't know what's wrong with you...go away". But recently I have been having symptoms similar to a flare but not really the same as when I flare. And after reading some literature on IBS and posts on an IBS forum, I think I have IBS, which I guess could be explained as having symptoms without any evidence of active IBD. I have had major cramping, rumbly guts, frequent, urgent bowel movements consisting of shoestring stools alternating with bouts of constipation that doesn't last for more than a day, but really, really hard stools which are hard to pass. But it is definitely different than when I flare. The bouts are more controlled or predictable instead of happening at all hours of the night. It's just different and I don't know how to explain it. I talked to my GI about it and he agrees that it could be IBS but he wants to do a colonoscopy to be sure there is no active disease (my blood work has been good).
I am keeping my fingers crossed and expecting everything to come out good. I was just wondering if those of you that have been told you have both IBS and IBD, do you know the difference in your symptoms? How do you know when it's your IBD acting up or not. Do you go through testing every time? That seems extreme to me. But if you don't know what's going on, how do you know how to treat it?
I am keeping my fingers crossed and expecting everything to come out good. I was just wondering if those of you that have been told you have both IBS and IBD, do you know the difference in your symptoms? How do you know when it's your IBD acting up or not. Do you go through testing every time? That seems extreme to me. But if you don't know what's going on, how do you know how to treat it?