- Joined
- Feb 12, 2010
- Messages
- 40
Hello!
Looking to get some advice from some of you knowledgable folks!
I was diagnosed with Crohns 3 years (with a big flare the year before that & symptoms for approx 3 to 4 years prior aswell). Since diagnosis, I seem to have coped fairly well without any meds or any serious problems.
That is until the last 6 months or so when I started to get symptoms of a flare on & off and high inflammatory markers in test results.
I have been feeling a million times better in the last maybe 8 weeks or so, still the odd bout of bloating/gas....but certainly no significant pain.
However, at my last appointment with my GI (about 5 weeks ago now), he advised that even though I was feeling well, the inflammation in my stool sample indicated that perhaps there was more going on under the surface - and suggested that I should maybe be starting to think about meds to keep me in remission - specifically Azathioprine. However, he felt that since I hadn't any imaging done in 3 years (which previously showed strictures in my ileum) that he would send me for an MRI before deciding anything. He gave me away some info on the meds to look over.
I went for my MRI small bowel study and have now had a call from his secretary requesting that I go in next week to discuss getting started on Azathioprine and I am absolutely freaking out about all the possible side effects, effects on liver etc.
I wondered, is there a particular reason I would be started on Aza without trying Mesalamine/Asacol first (which seems to be to have less serious side effects)? Whats the difference between the drugs in terms of what they actually work to do? Is one more effective than the other for certain things? Should I be asking me GI if this is a possible alternative for me?
Thanks in advance!
Laura xx
Looking to get some advice from some of you knowledgable folks!
I was diagnosed with Crohns 3 years (with a big flare the year before that & symptoms for approx 3 to 4 years prior aswell). Since diagnosis, I seem to have coped fairly well without any meds or any serious problems.
That is until the last 6 months or so when I started to get symptoms of a flare on & off and high inflammatory markers in test results.
I have been feeling a million times better in the last maybe 8 weeks or so, still the odd bout of bloating/gas....but certainly no significant pain.
However, at my last appointment with my GI (about 5 weeks ago now), he advised that even though I was feeling well, the inflammation in my stool sample indicated that perhaps there was more going on under the surface - and suggested that I should maybe be starting to think about meds to keep me in remission - specifically Azathioprine. However, he felt that since I hadn't any imaging done in 3 years (which previously showed strictures in my ileum) that he would send me for an MRI before deciding anything. He gave me away some info on the meds to look over.
I went for my MRI small bowel study and have now had a call from his secretary requesting that I go in next week to discuss getting started on Azathioprine and I am absolutely freaking out about all the possible side effects, effects on liver etc.
I wondered, is there a particular reason I would be started on Aza without trying Mesalamine/Asacol first (which seems to be to have less serious side effects)? Whats the difference between the drugs in terms of what they actually work to do? Is one more effective than the other for certain things? Should I be asking me GI if this is a possible alternative for me?
Thanks in advance!
Laura xx
Last edited: