- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 84
Hello,
I'm new to the forum, but I'm certainly not new to having "stomach" issues. I've been reading so many stories here and I guess I'm not the only one frustrated by not being able to get a straight answer as to what I have or don't have.
To make a VERY long story short, I started having "stomach" problems 27 years ago, when I was 13 yrs old... I'm 40 yrs old now. I was diagnosed 6 years ago with IBS and that was the last time I saw the GI doctor...until recently. Of course I had flare ups and pain over the last 6 years but I just dealt with it myself and got through it alone.
This year has been different. I started experiencing more abdominal pain, more frequently and lasting longer (sometimes 4 or 5 straight days). I have NEVER EVER been the type of person to have chronic diarrhea. By June the pain was horrible and I developed a fissure with bleeding (blood clots and all). I went to the GI doctor and he did a sigmoidoscopy 2 weeks ago. During the procedure he discovered that I had an ulcer in the colon. He said that he was "very suprised" to find an ulcer because he believed the bleeding was from the fissure and not an ulcer. He didn't diagnose me immediately because I am not experiencing chronic diarrhea. He ask me if I had ever heard of Crohn's disease because that was what he thought I may have. I went for bloodwork and I have to go for a colonoscopy in early October.
I got the results of the biopsy and bloodwork. The ulcer biopsy came back as "inflamed" (which I already knew). The bloodwork came back as "borderline positive". My doctor is on vacation but another doctor looked at my chart and said he can't diagnose me because I don't have "all of the symptoms" i.e. chronic diarrhea. The nurse said that when I have the colonoscopy done in October the doctor will have a better idea as to whether the ulcer is inflamed due to an infection or if it's a "chronic" inflamation. She said if its still inflamed in October, it's a chronic inflamation and it can be diagnosed as either Crohn's or Colitis.
Is this normal? I understand that it's very difficult to diagnose. If it is chronic, will they be able to tell which of the two it is, Crohn's OR Colitis? A part of me is regretting going down this road. After 27 years though, it would be nice to confirm that I'm not mentally deranged! Anyway, thank you for taking time to read this. I'll be around here for the long haul it seems!
Art
I'm new to the forum, but I'm certainly not new to having "stomach" issues. I've been reading so many stories here and I guess I'm not the only one frustrated by not being able to get a straight answer as to what I have or don't have.
To make a VERY long story short, I started having "stomach" problems 27 years ago, when I was 13 yrs old... I'm 40 yrs old now. I was diagnosed 6 years ago with IBS and that was the last time I saw the GI doctor...until recently. Of course I had flare ups and pain over the last 6 years but I just dealt with it myself and got through it alone.
This year has been different. I started experiencing more abdominal pain, more frequently and lasting longer (sometimes 4 or 5 straight days). I have NEVER EVER been the type of person to have chronic diarrhea. By June the pain was horrible and I developed a fissure with bleeding (blood clots and all). I went to the GI doctor and he did a sigmoidoscopy 2 weeks ago. During the procedure he discovered that I had an ulcer in the colon. He said that he was "very suprised" to find an ulcer because he believed the bleeding was from the fissure and not an ulcer. He didn't diagnose me immediately because I am not experiencing chronic diarrhea. He ask me if I had ever heard of Crohn's disease because that was what he thought I may have. I went for bloodwork and I have to go for a colonoscopy in early October.
I got the results of the biopsy and bloodwork. The ulcer biopsy came back as "inflamed" (which I already knew). The bloodwork came back as "borderline positive". My doctor is on vacation but another doctor looked at my chart and said he can't diagnose me because I don't have "all of the symptoms" i.e. chronic diarrhea. The nurse said that when I have the colonoscopy done in October the doctor will have a better idea as to whether the ulcer is inflamed due to an infection or if it's a "chronic" inflamation. She said if its still inflamed in October, it's a chronic inflamation and it can be diagnosed as either Crohn's or Colitis.
Is this normal? I understand that it's very difficult to diagnose. If it is chronic, will they be able to tell which of the two it is, Crohn's OR Colitis? A part of me is regretting going down this road. After 27 years though, it would be nice to confirm that I'm not mentally deranged! Anyway, thank you for taking time to read this. I'll be around here for the long haul it seems!
Art