- Joined
- Aug 30, 2014
- Messages
- 21
Hi all. I hope you are doing good. I have not been here a lot lately. I was in the middle of graduation madness.
My daughter had her colonoscopy/endoscopy about 3 weeks ago. Pictures are beautiful. Biopsies.....NEGATIVE for granulomas, villous atrophy, Increased Inflammation, Ulceration, Dysplasia, and Malignancy.
In some parts biopsies show NON-Specific chronic inflammation, with few intramucosal lymphoid aggregates and mild vascular congestion superficial lamina propia.
Her disease is mostly located in in the terminal ileum, which shows occasional reactive Peyer's Patches.
According to the Doctor, She is on remission.
Hi araceli.
I'm new here, so I don't really know active users and their stories yet.
I don't want to just 'step in' into the conversation, but I'm sure you'll understand the need for answers.
I would like to ask you something, if you don't mind. :smile:
I've been struggling with severe symptoms for years. I've managed to get rid of most but the pain (in the terminal ileum region) and fatigue by a drastic change in my habits, and it took me like 10 months to get there. I've had my first biopsies done not too long ago, and the results are way too similar to those you mention:
NON-Specific chronic inflammation (colon),
lymphoid aggregates in the lamina propria(ileum & colon)
mild lymphoplasmocytic infiltrate (colon) (and also duodenum)
mild vascular congestion (colon)
My question is:
Is it possible that these results are just a picture of 'good times'?
I mean, is it normal to see recovery and drastic differences in colonoscopy/biopsy results in flare and remission times?
I'm just afraid that, after having worked really hard to relieve my symptoms, I will go undiagnosed/misdiagnosed because the biopsy results are not screaming any diagnosis.
Thx.:tongue: