Hi everyone.
Well as you all know, I am still not diagnosed. I just keep being told I have IBS. Well I started having pretty bad lower abdominal pain like in my pelvic area on Friday night. Well I woke up Saturday and It was pretty bad and kind of escalated all day. Well I layed down last night thinking : oh my God, I am so much pain. I have a pretty high pain tolerance so this was severe. I woke up at 1: 30 in the morning with just awful sharp pains in my lower pelvic abdominal area, it was kind of in the right side more so, but also some on the left. I really did not want to got to the ER, I mean damn, the flu is running rampant and I sure do not want that! Well It got so bad the pain, that I just decided to go.
When I got there I told my symtpoms to the doctor. They ordered blood work and took a urine culture. I even told them about how I have been dealing with this pain for almost two years now. I also told them about the slight pinkish blood tinged vaginal discharge I am getting. They did a pelvic exam where they just feel your ovaries and whatnot. Since I cannot take many meds and am so sensitive, they just gave me 3 tylenol and zofran( not sure why the zofran since I did Not have nausea, but whatever, they said it may help the bowel pain). When the blood came back normal they were just going to leave me go. At first the one lady doc mentioned a CT scan. Then she decided No, she was not goingt do it since I cannot drink the contrast( I have severe reactions to it). Well there was a time switch and I saw a different doctor who was taking over that shift. I told him, "listen, I am in pain, BAD pain here, I know something is not right". Then I asked him what he thought about doing the CT without the oral contrast, but with the injection in the vein. He said, YES, that that would be a good idea. Now I dont get it, the first lady doc said that because I am very thin they would not see much without the oral contrast. But then this doctor tells me, yes they can still get a good look without the oral contrast as long as you can have the injection one with the iodine. So finally I get the CT scan.
doctor comes back and says the CT scan did not show ANY appendisitis or anything else that would be of concern. He said that he did not have an explanation for my pain. I told him all the other tests I have had done( an MRE of small bowel, stool tests, blood work, etc...) I told him my gastro did not want to do a colonoscopy due to how bad I reacted to the MRE and the stuff I had to drink. Well this doctor said that I probably should eventually get a colonoscopy if all this keeps getting worse, but then he says that because my MRE of small bowel was normal and that they did not see anything sinsiter on this CT scan, he said He is pretty sure I dont have crohns! But he did say the only real way to rule out or diagnose crohns is through a colonoscopy with biopsies. But he said he was certain the scans would have showed something if I had crohns. I asked him about my pelvic ultrasound and he said it did not show anything concering.
Here is where things get nuts. So, he discharges me and says to follow up with my GI doc. I asked for a copy of the CT report just so I can have a copy, I like to have copies of all my tests. Well on the way home I am reading the report. This is what it says :It basically says all organs like liver, kidneys, spleen are all unremarkable. It also says there is NO small bowel obstruction and that the vascular osseous and soft tissue structures are unremarkable.
Then it says this about the CT part of the pelvis: There is a 2.3-cm corpus luteum within the left ovary. Mulitple follicles within the right ovary. There is suggestion of a mild hydrosalpinx.Multiple nabothian cysts are present in the cervix( which I already knew I had and was told this was normal by my gyne awhile back). But then it goes on to say there are uterine fibroids seen as well well. There is a small amount of free fluid which is likley physiologic( normal). There is no bowel obstruction. The appendix is unremakable. There is no pelvic adenopathy. The vasular, osseous and soft tissue structures and unremarkable.
OK, why the HELL did this doctor NOT tell me about the flbroids in my uterus??? I mean I was in there with severe pelvic pain and did tell him I had the blood tinged discharge! He did not even mention the fibroids! I called him when I got home and asked him about it. He then pulls up the CT image and I asked him ow big were the fibroids. He said that one measured 4 to 5 centimeters. Then I told him that the report said there were Fibroids seen( more than one). He said that a CT scan is ok at seeing them, but a vaginal ultrasound would be better. ( UMM ok, lets see here, I am dying in pain and it may be from my intestines, but it also could be related to my female parts too. WHY on Gods green earth did he not order a vaginal ultrasound while I was there!!!!!????). So now I am at home, still in agony with pain in my lower intestines and pelvic area with nothing to really help the pain.
WTH! I am so worried and feel so awful here. I mean this is why I HATE going to the ER! They are so F****** useless! I mean wouldn't you as a doctor have looked a bit more into the fibroid thing since I was complaining of some pinkish discharge for the last couple months?? I mean I just dont know what to think. Also he told me that I likely do NOT Have crohns as something would have been seen on the CT scan and the MRE I had a couple months back with me being in this much pain. But then he goes on to tell me I should get a colonoscopy eventually if the pain continues. But he says nothing about the female thing or fibroids.
Oh and on the CT report it says that Helical CT of abdomin was performed with administration of nonionic intraveinous contrast. Oral contrast partially opacified the bowel. But I did NOT drink any contrast at all!!! HOw could they say that. I mean I asked the doctor if they obtained a good picture as I know that usually it is better when you drink the contrast. He said they got a pretty good picture with just the intraveinous contrast. Can you get an accurate CT without the barium contrast???
So that is where I am. I am confused and in pain with No answers ( oh but now I do know I have uterine fibroids). Not sure about what to do about those..
Well as you all know, I am still not diagnosed. I just keep being told I have IBS. Well I started having pretty bad lower abdominal pain like in my pelvic area on Friday night. Well I woke up Saturday and It was pretty bad and kind of escalated all day. Well I layed down last night thinking : oh my God, I am so much pain. I have a pretty high pain tolerance so this was severe. I woke up at 1: 30 in the morning with just awful sharp pains in my lower pelvic abdominal area, it was kind of in the right side more so, but also some on the left. I really did not want to got to the ER, I mean damn, the flu is running rampant and I sure do not want that! Well It got so bad the pain, that I just decided to go.
When I got there I told my symtpoms to the doctor. They ordered blood work and took a urine culture. I even told them about how I have been dealing with this pain for almost two years now. I also told them about the slight pinkish blood tinged vaginal discharge I am getting. They did a pelvic exam where they just feel your ovaries and whatnot. Since I cannot take many meds and am so sensitive, they just gave me 3 tylenol and zofran( not sure why the zofran since I did Not have nausea, but whatever, they said it may help the bowel pain). When the blood came back normal they were just going to leave me go. At first the one lady doc mentioned a CT scan. Then she decided No, she was not goingt do it since I cannot drink the contrast( I have severe reactions to it). Well there was a time switch and I saw a different doctor who was taking over that shift. I told him, "listen, I am in pain, BAD pain here, I know something is not right". Then I asked him what he thought about doing the CT without the oral contrast, but with the injection in the vein. He said, YES, that that would be a good idea. Now I dont get it, the first lady doc said that because I am very thin they would not see much without the oral contrast. But then this doctor tells me, yes they can still get a good look without the oral contrast as long as you can have the injection one with the iodine. So finally I get the CT scan.
doctor comes back and says the CT scan did not show ANY appendisitis or anything else that would be of concern. He said that he did not have an explanation for my pain. I told him all the other tests I have had done( an MRE of small bowel, stool tests, blood work, etc...) I told him my gastro did not want to do a colonoscopy due to how bad I reacted to the MRE and the stuff I had to drink. Well this doctor said that I probably should eventually get a colonoscopy if all this keeps getting worse, but then he says that because my MRE of small bowel was normal and that they did not see anything sinsiter on this CT scan, he said He is pretty sure I dont have crohns! But he did say the only real way to rule out or diagnose crohns is through a colonoscopy with biopsies. But he said he was certain the scans would have showed something if I had crohns. I asked him about my pelvic ultrasound and he said it did not show anything concering.
Here is where things get nuts. So, he discharges me and says to follow up with my GI doc. I asked for a copy of the CT report just so I can have a copy, I like to have copies of all my tests. Well on the way home I am reading the report. This is what it says :It basically says all organs like liver, kidneys, spleen are all unremarkable. It also says there is NO small bowel obstruction and that the vascular osseous and soft tissue structures are unremarkable.
Then it says this about the CT part of the pelvis: There is a 2.3-cm corpus luteum within the left ovary. Mulitple follicles within the right ovary. There is suggestion of a mild hydrosalpinx.Multiple nabothian cysts are present in the cervix( which I already knew I had and was told this was normal by my gyne awhile back). But then it goes on to say there are uterine fibroids seen as well well. There is a small amount of free fluid which is likley physiologic( normal). There is no bowel obstruction. The appendix is unremakable. There is no pelvic adenopathy. The vasular, osseous and soft tissue structures and unremarkable.
OK, why the HELL did this doctor NOT tell me about the flbroids in my uterus??? I mean I was in there with severe pelvic pain and did tell him I had the blood tinged discharge! He did not even mention the fibroids! I called him when I got home and asked him about it. He then pulls up the CT image and I asked him ow big were the fibroids. He said that one measured 4 to 5 centimeters. Then I told him that the report said there were Fibroids seen( more than one). He said that a CT scan is ok at seeing them, but a vaginal ultrasound would be better. ( UMM ok, lets see here, I am dying in pain and it may be from my intestines, but it also could be related to my female parts too. WHY on Gods green earth did he not order a vaginal ultrasound while I was there!!!!!????). So now I am at home, still in agony with pain in my lower intestines and pelvic area with nothing to really help the pain.
WTH! I am so worried and feel so awful here. I mean this is why I HATE going to the ER! They are so F****** useless! I mean wouldn't you as a doctor have looked a bit more into the fibroid thing since I was complaining of some pinkish discharge for the last couple months?? I mean I just dont know what to think. Also he told me that I likely do NOT Have crohns as something would have been seen on the CT scan and the MRE I had a couple months back with me being in this much pain. But then he goes on to tell me I should get a colonoscopy eventually if the pain continues. But he says nothing about the female thing or fibroids.
Oh and on the CT report it says that Helical CT of abdomin was performed with administration of nonionic intraveinous contrast. Oral contrast partially opacified the bowel. But I did NOT drink any contrast at all!!! HOw could they say that. I mean I asked the doctor if they obtained a good picture as I know that usually it is better when you drink the contrast. He said they got a pretty good picture with just the intraveinous contrast. Can you get an accurate CT without the barium contrast???
So that is where I am. I am confused and in pain with No answers ( oh but now I do know I have uterine fibroids). Not sure about what to do about those..