Here is an article from the CCFA about SCD
http://www.ccfa.org/about/news/scd
Hi! I just read the article:
“…Arthur D. Heller, M.D., a New York City gastroenterologist who is certified by the American Board of Nutrition, points out several inconsistencies in the diet. "Foods are excluded," he says, "because of their purported inability to be digested well. But of the foods allowed, legumes are known to contain certain carbohydrates that are not well digested by humans. And while the diet prohibits regular sugar, it allows most fruits and fruit juices, which are high in fructose, or fruit sugar. Not only is fructose dense in carbohydrates, but fructose malabsorption can cause cramps and diarrhea, intensifying the very symptoms the diet is designed to alleviate."…
The article does not say that by the diet you have to soak allowed legumes for 12 hours before the cooking and wash out very well. ( I do not use any legumes just in case they still have quite enough f starch).Also by the diet
You are not allowed polysaccharides (all types of sugar) but allowed monosaccharides like honey and fructose in fruits. It is always works very to grow the doubts in the readers minds well when you tell only part of the subject
I am not going to argue it probably does not work for everyone but it works for me. As I told earlier my blood tests were getting better after 3 weeks of the diet.
Just for comparison:
23/11/2011
HB 12.1
PLT 457
Lymphocytes 0.5
Albumin level 32
C Reactive Protein 20
15/12/2011
HB 12.3
PLT415
C Reactive protein 4.11 (finally normal)
13/03/2012
HB 11
PLT 332 ( finally normal)
Lymphocytes 0.6
C Reactive Protein <5
29/05/12
HB 12.8
PLT 288
Lymphocytes 0.6
C reactive Protein <5
24/09/2012
HB 12.7
PLT 263
Lymphocytes 1.0
Albumin level 44 ( finally normal)
C reactive Protein <5
Letter from My doctor, Dr Peter Irving MA MD MRCP Consultant Gastroenterologist:
06/07/2012
I saw Tatjana in the IBD clinic today. She has gone onto carbohydrate modified diet to which she seems to have remarkable response at least as far as her inflammatory markers are concerned. This is supported by the fact that she feels markedly better. If this is really down to the diet then it is, of course, in contradiction to most of our knowledge regarding diet and Crohn, s disease to date and this is therefore very interesting.
I had MRI scan on 03/08/2012:
Comparison is made with the previous small bowel MRI dated 26/11/2011. Several skip lesions are again seen extending from the distal jejunum through to the neoterminal ileum. These skip lesions appear less extensive than previously and the mural thickening and mural enhancement is less marked than before. Less restricted diffusion is seen. Fibrofatty proliferation is again noted within the adjacent mesentery. There are 2 dominant skip lesions, one measuring 12 cm and involving the neoterminal ileum and one seen just inferior to this segment in the mid ileum again measuring 12 cm. Pseudo sacculations are seen within this more proximal skip lesion with mild prestenotic dilatation of 3 cm. The proximal and mid jejunum are unremarkable. As previously the sigmoid and especially the rectum appears thickened suggestive of a chronic distal colitis.
Con. Improved appearance to the skip lesions as described which now appear more chronic inflammatory in nature.
Letter from My doctor, Dr Peter Irving MA MD MRCP Consultant Gastroenterologist:
26/09/2012
I saw Tatjana in the IBD Clinic today. She continues to respond to specific carbohydrate diet. As she told me it would, her MRI shows improvement in the inflammatory activity of her small bowel disease, as well as its extent. It is difficult for me not to recommend that she should once again reconsider immunomodulation, given the fast that she still has active disease there, although I completely understand why she would rather simply continue with her current strategy as it appears to be working for her.
What I do not understand is why I still have the inflammation if my blood inflammation markers do not show any…
I have to admit that I was expecting much better results but maybe it is not possible to get miracle results after 14 years of the inflammation with in 8 month of the diet. ( My inflammation markers were much more worth in 2006 before the operation and were much better after the operation but after few years were getting worse again.)
I honestly do not think that “…the potential for nutritional deficiencies on the diet…” is more harmful than the harm of the immunomodulators.