- Joined
- Aug 30, 2016
- Messages
- 22
Hi Crohnies, I'm back again. I'm newly diagnosed and I wanted to canvass the masses for a bit of a conundrum that has just occurred to me. Apologies once again if I'm creating an unnecessary new thread (I tried searching, and didn't find an answer to what I was after).
One of the reasons I was so determined to get a diagnosis, and didn't stop chasing scans and tests (except for a three month period last year when I had diagnosis fatigue and just couldn't take it any more), was not just that I wanted treatment for increasingly severe abdominal pain. It was so that the disease could be monitored. If I have a progressive condition, I damn well want to know how it's moving around in my innards!
The thing is, I have small bowel Crohn's - and it's not anywhere near the proximal end. It's middle and distal (I'll get more detail from my GI on Friday). It's in the BLACK HOLE of the small intestine. It didn't turn up in a colonoscopy. It didn't turn up in a gastroscopy (a couple of mild spots of benign, inconclusive inflammation). It didn't turn up in an MRI. There was something *slightly* funny in the barium CT enteroclysis, but it wasn't conclusive. I've had a slightly high FC (95), a really low FC (12?! but I took laxatives, and I'm now realising that was probably stupid), and high FC (376 - which I know isn't high for a lot of people, but made my GI's eyebrows hit his hairline, and is why we're progressing treatment).
I finally got a pill cam, and it came back positive and useful. Which was exciting.
So here's the thing - I've read a few papers on FC and how useful it is for diagnosing Crohn's in various parts of the digestive tract. It turns out it's the most useful way to diagnose ileitis, compared to most other tests, but also that ileitis is prone to a lot of false negatives (yay, Type II errors. GDI!). I only got that 376 number because I took the sample when I was in actual agony (that was a fun day).
It turns out my Crohn's needs to be catch red-handed, not just active, but REALLY bad.
Here's my question. If I'm going on Imuran, with the goal of getting into remission, how the HELL can we monitor a disease that was so damn hard to diagnose in the first place? I mean, it took eighteen months to *find* it, and I know it's possible to have serious Crohn's and be asymptomatic (which is not good, because obviously long-term damage is happening in the background).
Am I going to be having a pill cam every six months? I presume FC, for sure, but with something prone to Type II errors, I'm not getting a lot of peace of mind out of that idea.
Anyway, for those of you that had a rough diagnosis road, I'd love to hear how your disease is monitored and how reliable that is for you.
Thanks in advance, and I hope you are all having a splendid, pain-free day.
One of the reasons I was so determined to get a diagnosis, and didn't stop chasing scans and tests (except for a three month period last year when I had diagnosis fatigue and just couldn't take it any more), was not just that I wanted treatment for increasingly severe abdominal pain. It was so that the disease could be monitored. If I have a progressive condition, I damn well want to know how it's moving around in my innards!
The thing is, I have small bowel Crohn's - and it's not anywhere near the proximal end. It's middle and distal (I'll get more detail from my GI on Friday). It's in the BLACK HOLE of the small intestine. It didn't turn up in a colonoscopy. It didn't turn up in a gastroscopy (a couple of mild spots of benign, inconclusive inflammation). It didn't turn up in an MRI. There was something *slightly* funny in the barium CT enteroclysis, but it wasn't conclusive. I've had a slightly high FC (95), a really low FC (12?! but I took laxatives, and I'm now realising that was probably stupid), and high FC (376 - which I know isn't high for a lot of people, but made my GI's eyebrows hit his hairline, and is why we're progressing treatment).
I finally got a pill cam, and it came back positive and useful. Which was exciting.
So here's the thing - I've read a few papers on FC and how useful it is for diagnosing Crohn's in various parts of the digestive tract. It turns out it's the most useful way to diagnose ileitis, compared to most other tests, but also that ileitis is prone to a lot of false negatives (yay, Type II errors. GDI!). I only got that 376 number because I took the sample when I was in actual agony (that was a fun day).
It turns out my Crohn's needs to be catch red-handed, not just active, but REALLY bad.
Here's my question. If I'm going on Imuran, with the goal of getting into remission, how the HELL can we monitor a disease that was so damn hard to diagnose in the first place? I mean, it took eighteen months to *find* it, and I know it's possible to have serious Crohn's and be asymptomatic (which is not good, because obviously long-term damage is happening in the background).
Am I going to be having a pill cam every six months? I presume FC, for sure, but with something prone to Type II errors, I'm not getting a lot of peace of mind out of that idea.
Anyway, for those of you that had a rough diagnosis road, I'd love to hear how your disease is monitored and how reliable that is for you.
Thanks in advance, and I hope you are all having a splendid, pain-free day.