After waiting for more than a month, my first GI doc appointment came and went in less than 12 minutes. I was disappointed.
The doctor is well-known in my area for being one of the "top IBD" doctors. I had burned to CD my abdominal X-Ray, my abdominal MRI and even an abdominal CT-scan I had done 10 years ago for comparison, along with all the interpretive reports. Lastly, I came armed with the ASCA blood test, for which I tested positive.
The doc quickly discounted the ASCA test, stating that a lot of people can test positive, especially those who are genetically inclined to IBD, but don't necessarily have it. Ok, fine. But what about that glowing "focal ileus" of the small bowel showing up in my left-mid abdomen? "I don't read films...I leave that to the radiologists." Sigh. Really?
He only got me up on the exam table long enough to quickly feel around my abdomen and ask if anything hurt. No fecal test. No listening to bowel sounds. Then he said, "If it weren't for your blood test, I'd say at most you have a mild form of Crohn's." But he made it clear he didn't think I had it at all, just by looking at me and feeling around my abdomen for less than a minute.
So, he ordered an upper endoscopy and a colonoscopy. When I asked why order that instead of a pill endoscopy, since my problem is in the mid-abdomen where neither test will reach, he dismissed the idea. And, apparently, Anthem's crappy insurance won't cover the pill camera unless the doc first does at least a colonoscopy.
Is this kind of experience common? Am I asking too much? Are doctors that intuitive that they can just size up a person physically and assume nothing is wrong? What is going on here?
So frustrated.
The doctor is well-known in my area for being one of the "top IBD" doctors. I had burned to CD my abdominal X-Ray, my abdominal MRI and even an abdominal CT-scan I had done 10 years ago for comparison, along with all the interpretive reports. Lastly, I came armed with the ASCA blood test, for which I tested positive.
The doc quickly discounted the ASCA test, stating that a lot of people can test positive, especially those who are genetically inclined to IBD, but don't necessarily have it. Ok, fine. But what about that glowing "focal ileus" of the small bowel showing up in my left-mid abdomen? "I don't read films...I leave that to the radiologists." Sigh. Really?
He only got me up on the exam table long enough to quickly feel around my abdomen and ask if anything hurt. No fecal test. No listening to bowel sounds. Then he said, "If it weren't for your blood test, I'd say at most you have a mild form of Crohn's." But he made it clear he didn't think I had it at all, just by looking at me and feeling around my abdomen for less than a minute.
So, he ordered an upper endoscopy and a colonoscopy. When I asked why order that instead of a pill endoscopy, since my problem is in the mid-abdomen where neither test will reach, he dismissed the idea. And, apparently, Anthem's crappy insurance won't cover the pill camera unless the doc first does at least a colonoscopy.
Is this kind of experience common? Am I asking too much? Are doctors that intuitive that they can just size up a person physically and assume nothing is wrong? What is going on here?
So frustrated.