I've a quite a few confusing relays of info from doctors, but this one still bugs me.
I had just gotten biopsy results from a upper and lower endoscopy, the result was not clear for a particular form of IBD so an MRI was ordered and repeat FC (my first result was 1700). The doctor who ordered these things, discussed FC results with me. She said "even a result above 30 is abnormal" I was under the impression under 50 was normal, but I'll listen to the doctor. A few weeks later I got a letter from this doctor, saying my FC was low and reassuring, but it was 130. Total contradiction.
Now has anyone else had a similar experience in which they had a very high FC then went to a lower but still considered high level, but your doctor was pleased with this? Is there an accepted limit for people with IBD? But I haven't been diagnosed yet so even if 130 is a safe limit, this technically shouldn't apply to me right?
I had just gotten biopsy results from a upper and lower endoscopy, the result was not clear for a particular form of IBD so an MRI was ordered and repeat FC (my first result was 1700). The doctor who ordered these things, discussed FC results with me. She said "even a result above 30 is abnormal" I was under the impression under 50 was normal, but I'll listen to the doctor. A few weeks later I got a letter from this doctor, saying my FC was low and reassuring, but it was 130. Total contradiction.
Now has anyone else had a similar experience in which they had a very high FC then went to a lower but still considered high level, but your doctor was pleased with this? Is there an accepted limit for people with IBD? But I haven't been diagnosed yet so even if 130 is a safe limit, this technically shouldn't apply to me right?