First, apologies. This may turn out quite long, and will probably only make sense to those who work in a school anyway.
The school's regular ed psych is on long term sick leave, with no supply cover (instead the other psychs in the area are picking up extra cases). As a result, there are very few new cases being seen. We have 3 quite urgent cases. One is a girl who will shortly be moving to secondary school, and functions around the level of a 5 year old child (academically and behaviour/emotionally). The second is a 6 year old boy, who functions at the level of a toddler, the only difference is he's toilet trained! The third is only 3 or 4, and is not yet in school. She has cerebral palsy, cannot walk unaided and is not toilet trained.
Our SENCO had to present just one case to the ed psych. She chose the young girl 'because she has physical needs'. Yes, but how can a child who is not yet at our school take priority over the others? And her physical needs would not be addressed by the ed psych anyway. And since she has an actual diagnosis, if the parents requested a statement, it would almost certainly go straight through with no contesting. The other 2 are going to have to fight for every last bit of help, the one with cerebral palsy will get it offered automatically almost.
I'll tell you the reason(s) why that girl was picked. 1) when she does start school, she'll be in the SENCO's class. And 2) she doesn't want to have to deal with a child in nappies. In fact, the consensus in the staffroom was that she should not be in mainstream school because of that. Yet yesterday, the same people were saying how the local special school just 'babysits' the children, and there are no academic challenges for the kids there.
I'm afraid our SENCO just pees me off big time! If my Crohn's got worse and I had accidents, or needed to wear protection, would they consign me to the scrapheap too?
The school's regular ed psych is on long term sick leave, with no supply cover (instead the other psychs in the area are picking up extra cases). As a result, there are very few new cases being seen. We have 3 quite urgent cases. One is a girl who will shortly be moving to secondary school, and functions around the level of a 5 year old child (academically and behaviour/emotionally). The second is a 6 year old boy, who functions at the level of a toddler, the only difference is he's toilet trained! The third is only 3 or 4, and is not yet in school. She has cerebral palsy, cannot walk unaided and is not toilet trained.
Our SENCO had to present just one case to the ed psych. She chose the young girl 'because she has physical needs'. Yes, but how can a child who is not yet at our school take priority over the others? And her physical needs would not be addressed by the ed psych anyway. And since she has an actual diagnosis, if the parents requested a statement, it would almost certainly go straight through with no contesting. The other 2 are going to have to fight for every last bit of help, the one with cerebral palsy will get it offered automatically almost.
I'll tell you the reason(s) why that girl was picked. 1) when she does start school, she'll be in the SENCO's class. And 2) she doesn't want to have to deal with a child in nappies. In fact, the consensus in the staffroom was that she should not be in mainstream school because of that. Yet yesterday, the same people were saying how the local special school just 'babysits' the children, and there are no academic challenges for the kids there.
I'm afraid our SENCO just pees me off big time! If my Crohn's got worse and I had accidents, or needed to wear protection, would they consign me to the scrapheap too?