Alright people, I need your input!
I have a follow-up with my GI in about a month. I'm a mild case (for the moment), on Pentasa, currently tapering off steroids. I'm improving, but I'm not out of the woods yet -- today is kind of a crummy off-day, and although the medication I'm on seems to be working on the problems in my ileum, every stomach pain makes me wonder if other issues are/are not being addressed.
So, I figure I'm going to ask my doctor about trying LDN. I realize that this will be a bit tricky, so I plan to either contact her ahead of time with further info, or come armed with the Stanford clinical trials study. Not sure what she'll say, but FWIW, she seemed open to at least one other form of "alternative" therapy (specifically, elemental nutrition -- she only warned that it was hard to stick to, and that she unfortunately was unable to prescribe a nutrition drink that would work, which I think might be a common problem in the U.S.).
Before I do all of this, however, I'm wondering about your opinions of where LDN would fall on the spectrum of treatments for Crohn's. I realize that it works differently than the conventional medications, so I'm not sure where it lies. Would you consider LDN to be a first-line drug? Something that's appropriate for mild cases? Or do you think it's something to be tried only after other conventional medications have failed? Similarly, would this fall under a "maintenance" medication? Or would the patient simply be able to hop off the drug and take it again when needed, a la corticosteroids?
I have no problem staying on Pentasa either, and I plan on telling my gastroenterologist just that.
My rationale here is that while I've got the rest of my life to figure this stuff out, I can always try out other medications later if the LDN doesn't work for me. Not sure if she'll go for it, but the next step for me (Aza) seems like a fairly big jump. I'm not opposed to it, but I'd like to try something else first. The side-effect profile seems pretty promising as well. I'm also on the "mild" side of the disease, so it might be less risky for her to try it on me vs. someone who is developing serious complications.
Help me out here guys and gals!
I have a follow-up with my GI in about a month. I'm a mild case (for the moment), on Pentasa, currently tapering off steroids. I'm improving, but I'm not out of the woods yet -- today is kind of a crummy off-day, and although the medication I'm on seems to be working on the problems in my ileum, every stomach pain makes me wonder if other issues are/are not being addressed.
So, I figure I'm going to ask my doctor about trying LDN. I realize that this will be a bit tricky, so I plan to either contact her ahead of time with further info, or come armed with the Stanford clinical trials study. Not sure what she'll say, but FWIW, she seemed open to at least one other form of "alternative" therapy (specifically, elemental nutrition -- she only warned that it was hard to stick to, and that she unfortunately was unable to prescribe a nutrition drink that would work, which I think might be a common problem in the U.S.).
Before I do all of this, however, I'm wondering about your opinions of where LDN would fall on the spectrum of treatments for Crohn's. I realize that it works differently than the conventional medications, so I'm not sure where it lies. Would you consider LDN to be a first-line drug? Something that's appropriate for mild cases? Or do you think it's something to be tried only after other conventional medications have failed? Similarly, would this fall under a "maintenance" medication? Or would the patient simply be able to hop off the drug and take it again when needed, a la corticosteroids?
I have no problem staying on Pentasa either, and I plan on telling my gastroenterologist just that.
My rationale here is that while I've got the rest of my life to figure this stuff out, I can always try out other medications later if the LDN doesn't work for me. Not sure if she'll go for it, but the next step for me (Aza) seems like a fairly big jump. I'm not opposed to it, but I'd like to try something else first. The side-effect profile seems pretty promising as well. I'm also on the "mild" side of the disease, so it might be less risky for her to try it on me vs. someone who is developing serious complications.
Help me out here guys and gals!