My husband Peter was diagnosed with Crohns disease not quite 2 years ago. He has been on the medication wheel with no progress,the only medication that he responded to was IV steroids. Peter had a resection in august this year resulting in an ileostomy and only his rectum remaining. The doctors told us that the resection would settle things down for a while and they would be able to achieve remission. 5 weeks after the resection he had another flare, this flare up didn't settle and has resulted in him being hospitalised once again. A flexi scope was performed on Tuesday showing his remaining rectum is severely inflamed and diseased.
Now the doctors are saying that if they perform a reversal this will settle the rectum down. This will be a 3 part operation, cut down the middle as they are unable to do it key hole. The doctors are not very good at communicating with us so it is difficult to be able to understand how this will help. Our other gastro doctor does not agree that this is going to work, in fact he thinks that the best approach would be to remove the remaining bowel. Peter had already accepted the idea that the ilieostomy would be permanent anyway.
Has anyone ever been through this? did it work for you?
My biggest fear is having the reversal done and then having to have a full colectomy if this doesn't work.
Now the doctors are saying that if they perform a reversal this will settle the rectum down. This will be a 3 part operation, cut down the middle as they are unable to do it key hole. The doctors are not very good at communicating with us so it is difficult to be able to understand how this will help. Our other gastro doctor does not agree that this is going to work, in fact he thinks that the best approach would be to remove the remaining bowel. Peter had already accepted the idea that the ilieostomy would be permanent anyway.
Has anyone ever been through this? did it work for you?
My biggest fear is having the reversal done and then having to have a full colectomy if this doesn't work.