My view is that if someone doesn't inform me, it's because they don't know. People who really know something, are dying to share it. I learn more from untrustworthy blogs than I do from WebMD or other trustworthy bull sites that just parrot the same crap over and over. When I get hold of something good like vagus nerve or gastroparesis... I go to pubmed and look it up for several hours until I understand it.
In that sense, no, I wasn't informed, and the internet has been the best place for me to learn about my disease. Doctors don't have time to do what I just described. They are too busy dividing their days into 15 minute increments and seeing patients, making snap decisions (usually accurate, sometimes not) about what illness they have, and making treatment decisions. I'm not blaming them, but expecting them to be an expert on your disease is not rational. Unless they're a special Crohn's-only expert, who only sees 4 patients a day, that's not happening.
I just want to add that WebMD isn't useless to me, I read that type of website (Medline, etc..) first because it provides a baseline, but I keep in mind that it's only the minimum information available. It's like a patient info brochure, meant to shield you from the yukky details. I live with yukky details, so I have a right to know what they are.