- Joined
- Jul 10, 2012
- Messages
- 169
I posted this a few days in the general forum, but I didn't get many responses. I'm trying to find someone that may have had a similar experience. I'm probably a bit different from others in the undiagnosed club, because I was able to get a Crohn's diagnosis really quickly. But then it was taken away when I switched GI physicians and now I don't know what to think. I'm very frustrated and stressed about all this. I just want to know what is really going on!
In early July, I was diagnosed with Crohn's disease following a month of acute diarrhea and several years of non-specific GI symptoms (really, really bad gas, bloating, pain in the RLQ). I was prescribed Lialda (mesalamine). I had a bad experience with the GI that diagnosed me, as she wasn't listening when I told her that Lialda drastically increased my symptoms. So, I switched GI docs. The new GI tells me that he can't believe they diagnosed me with Crohn's from looking at the biopsy results and my symptoms. He believes a more accurate diagnosis is microscopic colitis (probably lymphocytic). But he's calling it "diarrhea of unknown origin" until they are able to run a few more tests for me. I am completely blown away, as I have come to accept the Crohn's diagnosis and I think it makes sense based on other symptoms that I've had (extreme fatigue, joint pain, the pain in the RLQ). These other symptoms date back to my teenage years, although they've gotten worse with the current flare I'm having). I agree with the new GI that the biopsy results don't scream Crohn's disease...but I'm just not sure I should be accepting of his suspicion of microscopic colitis. From talking with others on the forum, it doesn't seem like the biopsy results fit with microscopic colitis either. Crohn's really seemed to make sense and fit with all of these other symptoms I've had. The new GI does not know what to think of these other symptoms and wants to refer me on to other specialists for the joint pain and fatigue issues. He wants to treat the GI stuff with Immodium. Has anyone gone through a change in diagnosis? I don't want to get my hopes up, as this GI made it seem as though it should be a relief to be diagnosed with microscopic colitis versus Crohn's. He said I would not have to take medications for the rest of my life--no Humira or Remicade. No need to worry about surgery...
The biopsy results:
"1. Biopsy terminal ileium: Benign mucosa, significant change is not seen.
2-3-4-5-6. Biopsies ascending, transverse, descending, sigmoid colon and rectum: Benign mucosa with mild acute colitis- cryptitis noted. No other changes are seen.
7. Biopsy rectosigmoid polyp: Portions of inflamed granulation tissue noted. No mucosa noted.
Comment: Minimal active colitis with inflamed granulation tissue suggest the possibility of inflammatory bowel disease- Crohn's. Clinical correlation suggested."
The new GI says that he doesn't believe it to be Crohn's because there were no chronic changes- just the acute colitis. I asked him if it were possible if the Crohn's was just caught very early before there was time for chronic changes to be seen to the mucosa, etc. He didn't seem to think so. Has anyone seen biopsy results similar to this? All of labwork has been within normal limits. CT scan was also normal. The first GI said that my colon "didn't look bad" visually.
Thanks for any input!
In early July, I was diagnosed with Crohn's disease following a month of acute diarrhea and several years of non-specific GI symptoms (really, really bad gas, bloating, pain in the RLQ). I was prescribed Lialda (mesalamine). I had a bad experience with the GI that diagnosed me, as she wasn't listening when I told her that Lialda drastically increased my symptoms. So, I switched GI docs. The new GI tells me that he can't believe they diagnosed me with Crohn's from looking at the biopsy results and my symptoms. He believes a more accurate diagnosis is microscopic colitis (probably lymphocytic). But he's calling it "diarrhea of unknown origin" until they are able to run a few more tests for me. I am completely blown away, as I have come to accept the Crohn's diagnosis and I think it makes sense based on other symptoms that I've had (extreme fatigue, joint pain, the pain in the RLQ). These other symptoms date back to my teenage years, although they've gotten worse with the current flare I'm having). I agree with the new GI that the biopsy results don't scream Crohn's disease...but I'm just not sure I should be accepting of his suspicion of microscopic colitis. From talking with others on the forum, it doesn't seem like the biopsy results fit with microscopic colitis either. Crohn's really seemed to make sense and fit with all of these other symptoms I've had. The new GI does not know what to think of these other symptoms and wants to refer me on to other specialists for the joint pain and fatigue issues. He wants to treat the GI stuff with Immodium. Has anyone gone through a change in diagnosis? I don't want to get my hopes up, as this GI made it seem as though it should be a relief to be diagnosed with microscopic colitis versus Crohn's. He said I would not have to take medications for the rest of my life--no Humira or Remicade. No need to worry about surgery...
The biopsy results:
"1. Biopsy terminal ileium: Benign mucosa, significant change is not seen.
2-3-4-5-6. Biopsies ascending, transverse, descending, sigmoid colon and rectum: Benign mucosa with mild acute colitis- cryptitis noted. No other changes are seen.
7. Biopsy rectosigmoid polyp: Portions of inflamed granulation tissue noted. No mucosa noted.
Comment: Minimal active colitis with inflamed granulation tissue suggest the possibility of inflammatory bowel disease- Crohn's. Clinical correlation suggested."
The new GI says that he doesn't believe it to be Crohn's because there were no chronic changes- just the acute colitis. I asked him if it were possible if the Crohn's was just caught very early before there was time for chronic changes to be seen to the mucosa, etc. He didn't seem to think so. Has anyone seen biopsy results similar to this? All of labwork has been within normal limits. CT scan was also normal. The first GI said that my colon "didn't look bad" visually.
Thanks for any input!