Well for the creatine hydrochloride you only need around 1 gram as the patient took.
Why they are using the monohydrate,dont know but for weight lifters
the loading dose is around 21 grams then they drop back.
So that is what they might be trying in the clinical trial.
Mine is arriving in the mail this afternoon.
You can get at walmart but it is 75% creatine hydochoride and 25% artificial sweetener,
so I decided to get the pure stuff from ebay.
here are a few more studies,for people who like to research for
any possible answer,as I do.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856803/
possible paleo connection,might even have something to do
with why vegans get IBD,who knows.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26874700
creatine kinase and inflammatory disorders
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4987751/
Metabolic regulation of intestinal epithelial barrier during inflammation
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.4161/21688362.2014.970936
monohydrate vs hydrochloride
https://www.kagedmuscle.com/blogs/science/85398979-benefits-of-creatine-hcl
too much or even some can be dangerous -rhabdomyolysis
also another caution pulls water into the muscles then causes dehydration
in the rest of the body, need to drink extra.
Also I think I read somewhere that supplements might decrease denovo
systhesis. ANother aspect is that if we dont need to make so much creatine
which uses 40% and I have read up to 70% of the methy groups from
Sam-E,these methyl groups might be useful for synthesis of other stuff.
The monohydrate probably the natural form.
Since I have been researching IBD since 1980, I was interested to see
something new and different.
Just took my first 0.5 gram dose, 1/8 teaspoon, we will see how my
gut likes it,or not.
Old Mike