Hi everyone,
I am brand new here as I just found this forum. Thank you to the Admins that have provided this resource.
I am a long time Crohns patient. I was diagnosed when I was 20 and I am now 51. Along the way I have tried a lot of the meds, and ended up with a bowel resection about 18 years ago. After the resection, I was tried on Imuran (didn't work) 6MP (screwed up my liver), and all the other "typical" treatment meds. As a brand new drug on the market, the docs tried me on a Remicade infusion. They scheduled me for 3 infusions and after two decided I was doing enough better they aborted the 3rd. After some time and another colonoscopy I was announced to me "in remission"... no sweeter words have ever been heard.
Fast forward to now.. I just had another colonoscopy last week. 3 years ago the peek and see showed the Crohns was back, but not bad enough to worry about. Now it is; the doc couldn't even get the scope through the narrowed section of bowel. My GI doc wants me to choose between Remicade and Humira for a treatment. He informed me that in the last 18 years they have discovered that starting and stopping the Remicade can result in bad allergic reactions which I know you are all familiar with. The Humira strikes me as having just as bad of side effects, maybe worse, and being the "new drug" on the block like Remicade was back in the day, which leaves me wondering "what don't they know about Humira like they didn't know about the reactions with Remicade?"
I am really looking for input on which way to go between the two treatments. Both scare the bejezus out of me. In what google searching I have done, I saw a number of 17% on one site for the number of patients who stopped Remicade and then restarted that had allergic reactions. Does that sound right?
I would sure welcome some thoughts, ideas, and recommendations....
Thanks,
Dwight
I am brand new here as I just found this forum. Thank you to the Admins that have provided this resource.
I am a long time Crohns patient. I was diagnosed when I was 20 and I am now 51. Along the way I have tried a lot of the meds, and ended up with a bowel resection about 18 years ago. After the resection, I was tried on Imuran (didn't work) 6MP (screwed up my liver), and all the other "typical" treatment meds. As a brand new drug on the market, the docs tried me on a Remicade infusion. They scheduled me for 3 infusions and after two decided I was doing enough better they aborted the 3rd. After some time and another colonoscopy I was announced to me "in remission"... no sweeter words have ever been heard.
Fast forward to now.. I just had another colonoscopy last week. 3 years ago the peek and see showed the Crohns was back, but not bad enough to worry about. Now it is; the doc couldn't even get the scope through the narrowed section of bowel. My GI doc wants me to choose between Remicade and Humira for a treatment. He informed me that in the last 18 years they have discovered that starting and stopping the Remicade can result in bad allergic reactions which I know you are all familiar with. The Humira strikes me as having just as bad of side effects, maybe worse, and being the "new drug" on the block like Remicade was back in the day, which leaves me wondering "what don't they know about Humira like they didn't know about the reactions with Remicade?"
I am really looking for input on which way to go between the two treatments. Both scare the bejezus out of me. In what google searching I have done, I saw a number of 17% on one site for the number of patients who stopped Remicade and then restarted that had allergic reactions. Does that sound right?
I would sure welcome some thoughts, ideas, and recommendations....
Thanks,
Dwight