- Joined
- Apr 6, 2012
- Messages
- 236
had my follow up appt with the GI today and he said there's nothing wrong with me.. WTF!?
He said that given my faecal calprotectin was negative he would be VERY surprised if it's crohns.
so I asked why the CTE had shown inflammation and reactive lymph nodes then and he said the scans can be wrong, it was possibly just an ?artefact?.
He said we'll do the colonoscopy to which I advised I have already got appt with public system for monday for that so he's written a letter to add a gastroscopy as well.
Then he said there is something in the small bowel but he thinks it might be a stricture.. he said the CTE report said there is a narrowing (umm NOWHERE on the report does it say that.. it says NO sign of obstruction or stenosis!) so we will do a pill cam after the scopes show nothing (so he must be pretty confident they won't) then went on to say that although the pillcam can be dangerous if it gets stuck at the stricture it might be good if it does because they can "whip me into surgery and take the stricture out at the same time as the cam.. done and dusted. problem solved" WTF!?!?
He said he's a little confused why I am anemic (I don't have a functioning uterus so not from that) and said we need to see what's going on in the small bowel.
so what is going on?? The report said there is inflammation and enlarged reactive nodes consistent with inflammation but GI saying no inflammation.
report says no sign of obstruction or stenosis but doc says he thinks there is a stricture.
HUH!?!? I am so confused and have no idea what to think.
oh, and I asked why I am in so much pain and having bleeding and the runs etc then.. he said "I don't know" and shrugged his shoulders!
This is THE best gastrologist in the city!
He said that given my faecal calprotectin was negative he would be VERY surprised if it's crohns.
so I asked why the CTE had shown inflammation and reactive lymph nodes then and he said the scans can be wrong, it was possibly just an ?artefact?.
He said we'll do the colonoscopy to which I advised I have already got appt with public system for monday for that so he's written a letter to add a gastroscopy as well.
Then he said there is something in the small bowel but he thinks it might be a stricture.. he said the CTE report said there is a narrowing (umm NOWHERE on the report does it say that.. it says NO sign of obstruction or stenosis!) so we will do a pill cam after the scopes show nothing (so he must be pretty confident they won't) then went on to say that although the pillcam can be dangerous if it gets stuck at the stricture it might be good if it does because they can "whip me into surgery and take the stricture out at the same time as the cam.. done and dusted. problem solved" WTF!?!?
He said he's a little confused why I am anemic (I don't have a functioning uterus so not from that) and said we need to see what's going on in the small bowel.
so what is going on?? The report said there is inflammation and enlarged reactive nodes consistent with inflammation but GI saying no inflammation.
report says no sign of obstruction or stenosis but doc says he thinks there is a stricture.
HUH!?!? I am so confused and have no idea what to think.
oh, and I asked why I am in so much pain and having bleeding and the runs etc then.. he said "I don't know" and shrugged his shoulders!
This is THE best gastrologist in the city!