- Joined
- Oct 18, 2012
- Messages
- 4,492
Does anyone else find it upsetting when people unintentionally imply that people are responsible for being ill, or at least for not getting better?
Have you ever heard someone say that a person beat cancer (or any other illness) because of their positive attitude or determination? Do they realise that this means they are also saying that if someone dies from cancer it’s because their attitude wasn’t positive enough?
It’s like when someone recovers from an illness and says it was because God answered their prayers. Does someone who doesn’t recover not pray hard enough?
This is the one that upset me recently: as some of you might have seen I’ve mentioned on this forum before that I’m infertile. So many times I’ve heard someone say the only reason they’ve coped with an illness is because of their children, and that if it wasn’t for their children they wouldn’t have made it. I’m sure this kind of comment is said in all sincerity - they love their children so much and it does feel like that’s the only reason they can only cope with Crohn’s (or any other illness). So are those of us without children to spend our lives in miserable sickness because we have no reason to motivate us into coping? Is that why some of us end up having multiple surgeries while others have none? Obviously it’s not, but why attribute positives to these things but not negatives?
I’m not really expecting answers to these questions, I’m just venting. Those of us with a chronic illness like Crohn’s in particular often have to put up with doctors and others telling us our symptoms are a result of our inability to handle stress or due to unhealthy lifestyles. Sometimes I just wish more people could recognise that our abilities to change our illnesses are limited. A positive attitude can only go so far before it becomes unrealistic delusion. Some aspects of illness – often the most major aspects – are just down to physical determinants and other factors beyond our understanding and control.
Have you ever heard someone say that a person beat cancer (or any other illness) because of their positive attitude or determination? Do they realise that this means they are also saying that if someone dies from cancer it’s because their attitude wasn’t positive enough?
It’s like when someone recovers from an illness and says it was because God answered their prayers. Does someone who doesn’t recover not pray hard enough?
This is the one that upset me recently: as some of you might have seen I’ve mentioned on this forum before that I’m infertile. So many times I’ve heard someone say the only reason they’ve coped with an illness is because of their children, and that if it wasn’t for their children they wouldn’t have made it. I’m sure this kind of comment is said in all sincerity - they love their children so much and it does feel like that’s the only reason they can only cope with Crohn’s (or any other illness). So are those of us without children to spend our lives in miserable sickness because we have no reason to motivate us into coping? Is that why some of us end up having multiple surgeries while others have none? Obviously it’s not, but why attribute positives to these things but not negatives?
I’m not really expecting answers to these questions, I’m just venting. Those of us with a chronic illness like Crohn’s in particular often have to put up with doctors and others telling us our symptoms are a result of our inability to handle stress or due to unhealthy lifestyles. Sometimes I just wish more people could recognise that our abilities to change our illnesses are limited. A positive attitude can only go so far before it becomes unrealistic delusion. Some aspects of illness – often the most major aspects – are just down to physical determinants and other factors beyond our understanding and control.