We all need to be on our game to make sure that doesnt happen….there is no doubt in my mind that a big pharma company, if they were aware there was a cure, they would TRY to buy out JHT for millions….millions and millions, hundreds of millions!
My sisters husband worked for a small company that had a promising islet cell process. The company had plans to really change the treatment landscape for diabetes. Some big pharma company came along and made them an offer that made the owners incredibly rich, and the company was sold. The therapy was never heard from again. Nobody can come along and pick up the work, or they'd be stepping on patents, so the status quo of suffering continues.
What we need is a way to wrest control from the established companies, but they are so loaded with money, they can usually simply buy off the owners of the paradigm changers. If each one of us was an owner, though, that might be a solution. If 100,000 people put in $50 each, which would put them in the treatment queue, then if a buyout came along at $100, or $500 or whatever, the answer would be "no, I won't give up my chance at a cure for fifty or a couple hundred bucks"
I got a very high-level description of the treatment while my brother in law was still working on it. It wasn't a typical chemical/pill, I know that much. Later, after they got bought out, he didn't want to talk about the details...I think he had to sign something. He did say that it looked awesome in the mouse trials and he was/is very disappointed that the big pharma company seems to have simply buried it. He also was the most junior member in the company (every other employee was a PhD), so he didn't profit very much from the sale...another reason to be disappointed.that is very sad about the diabetes…what was the treatment?
the more you get into this medical pharm world you realise how it is entriely driven by profit and they are profiting off the diseases, big time.
I got a very high-level description of the treatment while my brother in law was still working on it. It wasn't a typical chemical/pill, I know that much. Later, after they got bought out, he didn't want to talk about the details...I think he had to sign something. He did say that it looked awesome in the mouse trials and he was/is very disappointed that the big pharma company seems to have simply buried it. He also was the most junior member in the company (every other employee was a PhD), so he didn't profit very much from the sale...another reason to be disappointed.
The business model is totally messed up when the goal of a company is the status quo that makes them the most money. I wish there were an easy answer, but I think the best thing to do now is to keep laser focus on promising ideas and do what we can to keep them from getting buried.
My understanding is that they have not been able to detect enough MAP bacterium in biopsy/resected samples to pin the cause on it. I think that's why both Dr. Hermon-Taylor and the RedHill approach is to come up with a diagnostic tool to detect coupled with a medical treatment.... I then asked if he believed that Crohn's was caused by MAP and he said no, but then added that there is not enough research to support the theory. ...
I was talking to a GI doctor yesterday and I asked him if he knew about Dr. Herman-Taylor and his vaccine. He did not know anything about it. I then asked if he believed that Crohn's was caused by MAP and he said no, but then added that there is not enough research to support the theory. He does know of Dr. Borody though.
What is the magic number regarding research supporting a theory? Does anybody here happen to have any idea how many studies there are regarding MAP and Crohn's ? The argument that there is not enough evidence to support the theory seems to be common amount MAP skeptics. It would be nice to be able to counter with a number ... instead of just saying, "oh, but there are a lot of studies ...".
That's not true wildbill, they've actually proved causation by koch's postulates... So it without a doubt is a cause in at least a percentage of people with CD
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909502/Interestingly, MAP is at the center of a controversy as to its role (cause of, perpetuate of, innocent bystander) in Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, diabetes, sarcoidosis, Blau syndrome, and multiple sclerosis—diseases in which the incidence of systemic MAP is higher than that in the general population.
Did you read the next sentence on Wiki?here is koch's postulate #1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch's_postulates
"The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms."
If it is true that MAP is also found in healthy patients, then MAP does not fulfill the first requirement of causation.
Consider this reference:
However, Koch abandoned the universalist requirement of the first postulate altogether when he discovered asymptomatic carriers of cholera[5] and, later, of typhoid fever. Asymptomatic or subclinical infection carriers are now known to be a common feature of many infectious diseases, especially viruses such as polio, herpes simplex, HIV, and hepatitis C.
Do we know of anyone on this forum that is on the current RHB-104 anti-MAP therapy for Crohns patients? Is there a thread? I'm debating between this and ssi
I was talking to a GI doctor yesterday and I asked him if he knew about Dr. Herman-Taylor and his vaccine. He did not know anything about it. I then asked if he believed that Crohn's was caused by MAP and he said no, but then added that there is not enough research to support the theory. He does know of Dr. Borody though.
What is the magic number regarding research supporting a theory? Does anybody here happen to have any idea how many studies there are regarding MAP and Crohn's ? The argument that there is not enough evidence to support the theory seems to be common amount MAP skeptics. It would be nice to be able to counter with a number ... instead of just saying, "oh, but there are a lot of studies ...".
last time i checked into the map theory of crohn's the studies i read found higher levels of map in crohn's patients compared to control or uc patients.
Higher levels also means they found map in UC and healthy controls, which pretty much contradicts the theory of causation.
here is koch's postulate #1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koch's_postulates
"The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms."
If it is true that MAP is also found in healthy patients, then MAP does not fulfill the first requirement of causation.
Consider this reference:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3909502/
Notice they claimed it was higher, and not absent in the general population therefore, doesn't fullfill postulate #1. This may be wrong but If you have better source of information please post it.
Source: http://www.gutpathogens.com/content/pdf/1757-4749-5-23.pdfConversely, the microbiota of individuals with chronic
inflammation show lower bacterial diversity and it has
been determined that Clostridium clusters IV, particularly
F. prausnitzii, and XIVa are significantly less abundant in
IBD patients compared to healthy subjects [14,98,101].
Source: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-230X/13/20Although the cause of inflammatory bowel disease remains
unknown, the indigenous intestinal microbiota is considered
a major if not the main trigger of inflammation, both in
animal models and in humans.
JMC, what is your opinion on the fact scientists are finding reduced diversity in good bacteria which regulate inflammation and the potential these missing bacteria could be the cause of inflammation in IBD?
Also, how do you explain the reports we have regarding Fecal Transplants to have induced long remissions in IBD both crohn's?
Is it possible that the restoration of good bacteria that are missing and which regulate inflammation could have initiated a remission or a cure?
How do you think these facts relate to what you know about MAP and the cause of crohn's disease?
Were you previously aware of these facts i just provided?
Do you believe these scientific findings have any relevance to the treatment of IBD?
I'm interested in learning more details of MAP in regards to crohn's/IBD but tentatively I suspect that map is not of any causative relationship and is just another pathogen among others like AIEC that will be abolished with a fecal transplant when the missing bacteria in IBD patients are restored.
I really appreciate the above MAP/CD causation discussion, and am thankful for this site and the people who's thoughtful contributions make it so valuable.
The recent discussion reminds me of a similar problem...one that was "solved". The word is in quotes because even to this day, although there is agreement that a pathogen is require (but not sufficient), the "solution", thought to be benign, actually may not be.
"The only good H.Pylori is a dead H.Pylori" became (and still is, generally) the rallying cry of the practitioners. I am talking about H.Pylori/stomach ulcer situation. Many of us carry H.Pylori asymptomatically. There is considerable evidence that H.Pylori is protective in younger people! It serves to strengthen the immune system. And there is evidence (no one here needs to be reminded) that antibiotics used to eradicate H.Pylori might not be as benign as once thought. A good read on the whole microbiome diversity for health can be found in a book called "Missing Microbes".
The point I wanted to make was that the progression of the medical community towards consolidation on the stomach ulcer issue might be similar to the progression on the CD issue. If you explore the detailed history of campylobacter-like organisms and work your way to the current thinking, it might be an interesting exploration. Who was arguing for the change in thinking? Who was the hero, and what extrordinary action was taken to change thinking?
The point I wanted to make was that the progression of the medical community towards consolidation on the stomach ulcer issue might be similar to the progression on the CD issue. If you explore the detailed history of campylobacter-like organisms and work your way to the current thinking, it might be an interesting exploration. Who was arguing for the change in thinking? Who was the hero, and what extrordinary action was taken to change thinking?
http://discovermagazine.com/2010/mar/07-dr-drank-broth-gave-ulcer-solved-medical-mysteryCan you save me the time of searching for this an tell me the answer?
I think this was already posted, but nevertheless here it is: http://www.researchgate.net/profile...ucosal_Tissues/links/0a85e5358158944ea2000000
This makes a lot of sense, i.e. Crohn's as a syndrome rather than 1 disease, and explains why the lucky few manage to beat it through different treatments. Developing an accurate test for MAP will greatly enhance choice of effective treatments.
This article is interesting in that it splits the disease to two biotypes, one that seems to point the finger as MAP and related bacterium as a cause, the other to adherant invasive species as a cause.
Our
results suggest that Crohn’s disease patients may be divided
into distinct populations or biotypes: a population con-
taining plasmid-mediated adherence/invasion genes and the
other Mycobacterium-associated IS900 and 251F sequences.
These biotypes were found to be mutually exclusive: inva-
sion/adherence genes were not found in patients in which
IS900/251F was detected and vice versa.
100% remission from ssi vaccine? when did this happen? do you have a link?I think it will, theres gotta be a reason why some people have gone into 100% sustained remission from SSI vaccine, and some have gone into 100% sustained remission from anti-map therapy, and some others have benefited but not quite gotten to remission, I'd be extremely interested in giving the later group both and seeing what potential benefit that may have.
I am confused. Is this significant? http://www.google.com/patents/US8465753
Look up Trevor Wilson, I´ve spoken to him at several occasions. He is and still is in 100% full remission 3y after going off the SSI-treatment. He say that his values are like a normal person.
Is there a PayPal option to donate?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-15442/Could-vaccine-help-Crohns-disease.html
Daily mail article posted today
JMC do you know how much has been raised towards the 80K November target for the test portion? The vaccine web site doesn't show that clearly.The sad truth is years are passing by and this potential cure is waiting untested due to lack of funding.
JMC do you know how much has been raised towards the 80K November target for the test portion? The vaccine web site doesn't show that clearly.
For the trial itself it says they are raising that through investment and not charitable contributions. Do you know what investor shares cost?
JMC, do you happen to know when Hermon-Taylor's next article will come out?
JMC when you talk to Prof JHT again or his team can you please chase them up about setting up a PayPal link as an option to donate?
WOW thats excellent!!I spoke to Prof John Hermon-Taylor on the phone today and there are several exciting updates to announce soon - keep an eye on Facebook and the Crohn's MAP Vaccine website in the next few weeks. The bottom line is, things are falling into place for the human trials to start in November 2015, which would be amazing!
Just to clarify please. Are the human trials you mention for the MAP test or the MAP vaccine?
Can MAP be detected in fecal samples in humans? Like CDiff?
Any updates? I haven't seen anything about the vaccine trial next year.