- Joined
- Jun 22, 2012
- Messages
- 61
So I'm apparently back to square one again.
Back in April I had my first colonoscopy, which I thought showed lots of inflammation. It sure wasn't that pretty pale pink like in other's people's pictures - more like watermelon jolly rancher color. (Which sadly I haven't had in a long time.) And there was a lovely stricture. Couldn't even get past the splenic flexure in my colon and got to finish the day with a lovely barium enema. :ywow:
I wanted to see a gastroenterologist then, but was referred for a strictureplasty instead at Cal Pac Medical Center in SF. I had wanted to go to CalPac but for a consultation not a procedure I don't even know if I need. Ooops. So then I had to wait again for a referral and this time it was to a local doctor. That was a whole other nightmare.
First visit was good with lots of talk about being really interested in IBD, finding out what the stricture was, referring me for an endo MRI at CalPac, and narrowing down the Crohn's diagnosis. He sent me for a blood test (prometheus). Second visit he got the blood work back, said "yep it's Crohn's" and gave me meds. Which set me back 15 years - lost 10 lbs in 2 weeks. And when I went back he just tried a different med, but had apparently dropped the ball on any other tests or referrals to CalPac. When I told him I'd been experimenting with my diet (gone Paleo) he told me to stop interrupting him and went on to say that maybe he needed to refer me to someone that just deals with this. When he was done I again brought up the question of whether my prior low protein diet could have caused some of my symptoms, he got up, said "oh yeah, you need protein" and walked out of the office. :ybatty: Good riddance I say. At least he referred me to UCSF.
The only good thing was that I finally had someone say after 16 years of symptoms, "yes, this is Crohn's". It was both reaffirming (as I had thought it was all of this time so maybe I do know my body) and also a reality that has nonetheless been difficult to accept.
So that brings me back around to the "beginning"...agian. Had a great visit at the UCSF Gastroenterology Department. Met three doctors! And none of them are convinced that what I have is Crohn's. Here we go again. I mean I'm not that attached to it, but I'd like something narrowed down. It mostly comes down to the blood work and symptoms. "There's something there, but just not sure it's Crohn's." Could be SIBO, which was the first time I had that mentioned to me (and since then I've read up on it and yep, that makes sense too.) But we do want to find out what the stricture is from. And they want to see for themselves as the barium enema results don't seem to jive with the colonoscopy findings. Interesting. The barium enema found ulceration and mucosol lining changes, but they didn't think there was much to be seen on the colonoscopy except for the stricture. Oh, and that blood test my local GI Dr. did isn't so reliable, and he only did part of the whole panel anyway. :ymad: (Thanks for that useless test!) So Dr. Uma Mahadevan (hope she's my new superhero) wants to try to get PAST the stricture with the scope. And see what's going on in the small intestine with an MRI.
So yeah for me, two colonoscopies in one year and - this is quite special for a claustrophobic like me :shifty-t: - an MRI. Two scans in the MRI Tube of Terror. I'm hoping I'll still be out of it after the morning colonoscopy :yrolleyes: and I have a little happy pill if not. :ytongue:
But now I am back in the Waiting Zone. Now I remember how much I didn't like this...
Back in April I had my first colonoscopy, which I thought showed lots of inflammation. It sure wasn't that pretty pale pink like in other's people's pictures - more like watermelon jolly rancher color. (Which sadly I haven't had in a long time.) And there was a lovely stricture. Couldn't even get past the splenic flexure in my colon and got to finish the day with a lovely barium enema. :ywow:
I wanted to see a gastroenterologist then, but was referred for a strictureplasty instead at Cal Pac Medical Center in SF. I had wanted to go to CalPac but for a consultation not a procedure I don't even know if I need. Ooops. So then I had to wait again for a referral and this time it was to a local doctor. That was a whole other nightmare.
First visit was good with lots of talk about being really interested in IBD, finding out what the stricture was, referring me for an endo MRI at CalPac, and narrowing down the Crohn's diagnosis. He sent me for a blood test (prometheus). Second visit he got the blood work back, said "yep it's Crohn's" and gave me meds. Which set me back 15 years - lost 10 lbs in 2 weeks. And when I went back he just tried a different med, but had apparently dropped the ball on any other tests or referrals to CalPac. When I told him I'd been experimenting with my diet (gone Paleo) he told me to stop interrupting him and went on to say that maybe he needed to refer me to someone that just deals with this. When he was done I again brought up the question of whether my prior low protein diet could have caused some of my symptoms, he got up, said "oh yeah, you need protein" and walked out of the office. :ybatty: Good riddance I say. At least he referred me to UCSF.
The only good thing was that I finally had someone say after 16 years of symptoms, "yes, this is Crohn's". It was both reaffirming (as I had thought it was all of this time so maybe I do know my body) and also a reality that has nonetheless been difficult to accept.
So that brings me back around to the "beginning"...agian. Had a great visit at the UCSF Gastroenterology Department. Met three doctors! And none of them are convinced that what I have is Crohn's. Here we go again. I mean I'm not that attached to it, but I'd like something narrowed down. It mostly comes down to the blood work and symptoms. "There's something there, but just not sure it's Crohn's." Could be SIBO, which was the first time I had that mentioned to me (and since then I've read up on it and yep, that makes sense too.) But we do want to find out what the stricture is from. And they want to see for themselves as the barium enema results don't seem to jive with the colonoscopy findings. Interesting. The barium enema found ulceration and mucosol lining changes, but they didn't think there was much to be seen on the colonoscopy except for the stricture. Oh, and that blood test my local GI Dr. did isn't so reliable, and he only did part of the whole panel anyway. :ymad: (Thanks for that useless test!) So Dr. Uma Mahadevan (hope she's my new superhero) wants to try to get PAST the stricture with the scope. And see what's going on in the small intestine with an MRI.
So yeah for me, two colonoscopies in one year and - this is quite special for a claustrophobic like me :shifty-t: - an MRI. Two scans in the MRI Tube of Terror. I'm hoping I'll still be out of it after the morning colonoscopy :yrolleyes: and I have a little happy pill if not. :ytongue:
But now I am back in the Waiting Zone. Now I remember how much I didn't like this...