Just back from seeing the GI for both Matt and I.
Matt:
Bloods done a couple of weeks ago were all normal. Matt stated he has no issues and all is as usual.
The GI Spoke at length with him about various things including the risks of Thiopurines in someone his age. This was raised, once again, due to the GI emphasising that his age of onset and the need for surgery so soon after diagnosis put him into the severe category of disease. He is to have metabolites done again to ensure he is on the lowest effective dose possible. Of course there is nothing to say that this lowers any risk further but it can’t hurt.
This was countered with a more positive discussion on the statistics of recurrence of disease following surgery. The GI stated that if you get past the two year mark without a flare then the chances of flaring reduce considerably, for how long though is anyones guess. A lifetime would be good! :lol:
I then asked about his views on FC as a marker of disease status. He feels that for UC and large bowel disease it is a very reliable marker and so he uses it primarily for those with UC and large bowel Crohn’s. However he doesn’t agree with the recommendations of some cancer associations in relation to scoping for this same demographic as FC doesn’t replace screening for their higher risk of colorectal cancer. Hence he scopes every 1-2 years. As far as Ileal/small bowel disease is concerned he doesn’t think that FC is reliable enough. He bases this on studies and his own observations. As far as I can ascertain, for some time now he and his IBD nurse have been running FC in conjunction with scopes. They have found very good correlation between the two with large bowel disease but not near as promising a marry up with small bowel disease.
He also tried his darndest to get Matt to tell him what he was going to do next year, he finishes Honours in a matter of days, but it was to no avail. :lol: All I could say was welcome to my world of…I dunno.
So plan at this stage is repeat bloods with metabolites, a view to scoping in the next 12 months and review again next June.
Me:
Well I had I scopes due to my issues with upper abdominal pain. The GP reckons I have Crohn’s and well suffice it to say I just looked at him and laughed and said no way. I believe it is a feral gallbladder. Anyway, prep was an absolute delight…2 Senekot followed by Picoprep, then Glycoprep and lastly more Picoprep. The term pissing out of your arse springs to mind! :eek2: But wasn’t the sedation a dream! The last thing I remember is the anaesthetist, he could put his shoes under my bed anytime!, saying to me…roll on your left side before you fall asleep. I was thinking yeah no problem, I am wide awake! I rolled over and that was it, I was gone. I hope they enjoyed the view.
I saw the GI after the scope but he also did my review during Matt’s appointment the next day. He showed me pics and the basically upper scope is normal, just the tiniest hint of a hiatus hernia, so nothing to be seen that accounts for the pain. Biopsies taken.
Lower scope was normal apart from one polyp in the caecum, which he removed. He had the pathology results and it was a precancerous adenoma. With that in mind I am to be rescoped in three years. Biopsies taken.
So all in all a productive and good visit.
Dusty. xxx