I randomly clicked on this study regarding anterior fistulas "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2494247/"
It mentions: "One of the patients with a direct fistula had an anal gland carcinoma; there were two patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, etc".
But I could not find anywhere where it specificially mentions excluding these patients, can you? Please correct me if I am wrong.
The full quotation from the
study:
"One of the patients with a direct fistula had an anal gland carcinoma; there were two patients with pulmonary tuberculosis, but the
fistulae were nontuberculous. No other special aetiological factors were identified."
It says the fistulas themselves were nontuberculous, since tuberculosis can sometimes cause perianal fistula. (
Source here talking about fistulas which are caused by tuberculosis.) The last sentence also says that they weren't able to find any other factors that would cause the fistula, which implies Crohn's would be one of those.
You're right that it doesn't explicitly state the inclusions/exclusions from the study, although you can still glean it from what happened above. But that actually makes me more skeptical, since these really should be explicit about eligibility.
theOcean, one more thing I want to add... I just spoke to someone recently who indicated his son (with Crohns) went to India for treatment for a complex fistula. He said entire cost of treatment over course of 6 weeks was $100. $100!
I agree it would be odd to repeatedly mention the cost effectiveness..... but compared to the cost of surgeries/medications offered otherwise, perhaps that is one reason they mention the cost repeatedly.
But I'd argue that the constant reference to the cost actually shows bias on the behalf of the people writing these studies. I wouldn't trust them. Whenever I've read studies on other procedures, I haven't seen it mentioned, because what should be important is the end-result.
This person states that they have IBD and got this treatment done, but they link to a holistic health site (that they run!) where their experience is posted as a testimonial, with the only sources being ones by the doctor that operated on him, and one article linked to the person who came up with this surgery -- and that article is just a biography, not a study with any proof. They also constantly praise the cost. Another huge incidence of bias where I don't believe this is a real case.
When I try looking up the person who runs the website (and wrote this review) all I get redirected to is links to their site, as well as articles they've written for other natural medicine sites? And additional information that they're massage therapist. I really, reaaally don't think any of this is credible for way too many reasons. No photos of this person seem to exist online.
You can also look at their
supposed news articles, which are absolutely hilarious. More sun exposure equals less cancer! Medical community stalking unvaccinated children! No real sources, and just a bunch of sensationalist nonsense.
I also just noticed that you're in the thread this person created.
AFS also posted on IBD Support where
the surgeon they cite in their blog actually posts right after them, with all their videos! Also within the same day as AFS posting. Sounds a little dubious, I think.
The same surgeon actually pops up all over the IBD Support forum with the exact same post. Really, really skeptical. Accounts that talk about getting this treatment seem to have no other posts, except to mention kshar sutra to others. They also all seem to leave out any indication of having IBD, and suspiciously have no sources.