Cat-a-Tonic
Super Moderator
- Joined
- May 5, 2010
- Messages
- 10,718
So, I went to my in-laws on the 24th. My sis-in-law brought her 5 kids. I noticed that sis-in-law's baby had a lot of snot coming out of her, and my oldest niece informed me that "she's sick, everyone in our family has been sick this week, there's been a 'flu-fever' thing going through our house."
That made me really upset! Why would you bring a sick baby to xmas? The baby doesn't care, she is like 14 months old and doesn't really know what xmas is and doesn't even yet grasp the concept of opening gifts. The kid was obviously sick, keep her at home! Sis-in-law's husband could have stayed at home with their sick baby. Ugh, it just made me mad. They exposed me to their "fever-flu" germs when they know I have a chronic illness and a wonky immune system! That just seems really thoughtless to me. They could have let their baby rest and recover, and kept me from being exposed, but they did neither.
I did get the flu shot this year (in Oct, so it had plenty of time to kick in) and I was holding out hope that my flu shot would keep me from getting sick, but no such luck. I had read that the flu shot wasn't a very good match this year to the flu strains going around, and I guess that was the case, because I definitely caught the flu. Chills, fever, massive joint aches, sore throat, sinus issues, the works. I'm finally starting to get over it, my fever broke last night so I was able to get some sleep. It was really miserable for a couple days though and it's still no picnic now.
I'm really mad still. It's one thing to expose a chronically ill person to a cold, but the flu is different. If it had hit me harder, if it had set off a flare, anything like that - I could have would up in the hospital. So not cool! Am I overreacting? Or was that way out of line for my sis-in-law to bring her flu-contagious baby to xmas?
That made me really upset! Why would you bring a sick baby to xmas? The baby doesn't care, she is like 14 months old and doesn't really know what xmas is and doesn't even yet grasp the concept of opening gifts. The kid was obviously sick, keep her at home! Sis-in-law's husband could have stayed at home with their sick baby. Ugh, it just made me mad. They exposed me to their "fever-flu" germs when they know I have a chronic illness and a wonky immune system! That just seems really thoughtless to me. They could have let their baby rest and recover, and kept me from being exposed, but they did neither.
I did get the flu shot this year (in Oct, so it had plenty of time to kick in) and I was holding out hope that my flu shot would keep me from getting sick, but no such luck. I had read that the flu shot wasn't a very good match this year to the flu strains going around, and I guess that was the case, because I definitely caught the flu. Chills, fever, massive joint aches, sore throat, sinus issues, the works. I'm finally starting to get over it, my fever broke last night so I was able to get some sleep. It was really miserable for a couple days though and it's still no picnic now.
I'm really mad still. It's one thing to expose a chronically ill person to a cold, but the flu is different. If it had hit me harder, if it had set off a flare, anything like that - I could have would up in the hospital. So not cool! Am I overreacting? Or was that way out of line for my sis-in-law to bring her flu-contagious baby to xmas?
Last edited: